Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court 
What does China’s host bid mean for the High Seas Treaty? 
Iran-U.S. Negotiations: Tehran Reviews American Peace Proposal Amid Ongoing Gulf Conflict 
Lavrov Claims U.S. Seeks Control Over Damaged Nord Stream Pipelines 
Iran Demands Lebanon Be Part of Any Ceasefire Deal With Israel and the U.S. 
G7 Foreign Ministers Gather in France Amid Global Tensions and U.S. Policy Uncertainty 
Ukraine-Russia War: Frontline Updates as Spring Offensive Looms 
Jay Bhattacharya to Continue Leading CDC as White House Searches for Permanent Director 
Chinese Universities with PLA Ties Found Purchasing Restricted U.S. AI Chips Through Super Micro Servers 
CPAC 2026: Republicans Back Trump's Iran Strikes Amid Growing Public Skepticism 
God on their side: how the US, Israel and Iran are all using religion to garner support 
FEMA Reinstates $1 Billion Disaster Prevention Grant Program After Court Order 
U.S. Praises Kurdistan's Role in Oil Markets Amid Iran War Fallout 
Trump Seeks Quick End to U.S.-Iran Conflict Amid Ongoing Middle East Tensions 
WTO Reform Talks Begin in Cameroon Amid Global Trade Tensions 
California Renames Cesar Chavez Day to Farmworkers Day Following Sexual Abuse Allegations 
One of the figures that have been caught up in the long-ranging case surrounding the Capitol insurrection is Republican Rep. Mo Brooks, who was seen at the rally of disgraced former President Donald Trump hours before the riots. This week, the Justice Department refused to defend Brooks in a lawsuit stemming from the insurrection.
Reuters reports that in a court filing made Tuesday, the DOJ said that it will not defend Brooks in a lawsuit filed against him by Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. The lawsuit filed by Swalwell alleged that Brooks was also involved in the conspiracy to instigate the insurrection that left five people dead and dozens of police officers severely injured.
Brooks demanded that the DOJ represent him in the suit, citing that he would be covered by the Westfall Act, which protects federal employees from being sued or actions they have taken as part of their jobs. However, the DOJ said that Brooks’ appearance at the rally on January 6 was a campaign activity and is not part of his duties as a congressman. The House of Representatives Counsel has also refused to defend Brooks.
The DOJ’s refusal to defend Brooks in the lawsuit suggests that it may do the same for Trump, whose refusal to accept his election loss and constant peddling of the false election fraud claims culminated in the riots. Trump is also one of the defendants in Swalwell’s lawsuit.
“Members of Congress are subject to a host of restrictions that carefully distinguish their official functions on the one hand, and campaign functions on the other,” said the DOJ in the filing. “Inciting or conspiring to foment a violent attack on the United States Congress is not within the scope of employment of a Representative -- or any federal employee -- and thus is not the sort of conduct for which the United States is properly substituted as a defendant under the Westfall Act.”
The House Select Committee tasked with investigating the Capitol insurrection held its first hearing this week with some of the injured police officers. With the committee holding subpoena powers, former federal prosecutor Nick Ackerman said that any politician that worked with the right-wing militias during the attack should be worried.
Ackerman explained on MSNBC that if there are House members that coordinated with right-wing extremist groups Three Percenters, the Proud Boys, or the Oath Keepers, they would be exposed and prosecuted.
