Trump Inspects Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Renovation in Washington 
Apple Wins ITC Ruling, Keeping Blood-Oxygen Feature on Apple Watch 
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis 
CDC Monitors U.S. Travelers After Hantavirus Outbreak on Luxury Cruise Ship 
Florida Investigates OpenAI and ChatGPT Over Alleged Role in FSU Shooting 
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit 
Federal and State Authorities Conduct Widespread Fraud Raids Across Minnesota 
Iran Military Readiness Intensifies After Meeting With Mojtaba Khamenei 
Malaysia Unveils Energy Security Plan Amid Iran Conflict and Rising Oil Costs 
U.S. Flags Vietnam as “Priority Foreign Country” Over Intellectual Property Concerns 
Israel Expands Gaza Restricted Zones, Raising Concerns for Civilians and Aid Access 
Trump Reportedly Approves Plan to Remove FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Amid Growing Controversies 
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone 
FEMA Reinstates Employees After Dissent Letter, Signaling Shift in Workforce Stability 
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case 
Trump Administration Dismisses Entire National Science Board, Raising Concerns Over Scientific Independence 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
