The United States has officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant shift in global health policy that experts warn could harm public health both domestically and worldwide. The decision follows a year of escalating warnings from health leaders and international officials who argued that leaving the United Nations health agency would weaken global disease surveillance and response systems.
President Donald Trump initiated the withdrawal on the first day of his presidency in 2025 through an executive order, citing what the administration described as the WHO’s failures in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a joint press release from the U.S. Departments of Health and State, the United States will no longer participate fully in WHO activities and has no plans to rejoin or even serve as an observer. Instead, the U.S. intends to collaborate directly with individual countries on public health priorities, including disease monitoring and emergency response.
A key point of contention involves unpaid membership fees. Under U.S. law, the country was expected to provide one year’s notice and settle approximately $260 million in outstanding dues before exiting. However, State Department officials dispute that payment is a legal prerequisite for withdrawal, arguing that American taxpayers have already contributed sufficiently. The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that all U.S. funding to the WHO has ended, stating the organization’s actions had cost the U.S. trillions of dollars.
The withdrawal has already triggered major consequences. The U.S. flag was removed from WHO headquarters in Geneva, and the agency has entered a financial crisis. As its largest donor, contributing about 18% of total funding, the U.S. exit has forced the WHO to cut its management team, reduce budgets, and plan to lay off roughly a quarter of its staff by mid-year.
Global health leaders, including WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Gates Foundation chair Bill Gates, have urged the U.S. to reconsider. While a quick return appears unlikely, experts stress that the absence of U.S. leadership could weaken international cooperation and increase risks to global health security.


White House Pressures PJM to Act as Data Center Energy Demand Threatens Grid Reliability
Trump Signs Executive Order to Limit Wall Street Investment in Single-Family Homes
FDA Fast-Track Drug Reviews Delayed Over Safety and Efficacy Concerns
Taiwan President Offers Cooperation With Ukraine to Combat Sanctions Evasion
U.S. Schools Set to Bring Back Whole Milk After 15-Year Ban
Trump Drops Tariff Threat After NATO Talks on Greenland’s Future
Somaliland President Meets Eric Trump and Israeli President at Davos to Seek Recognition and Investment
Trump Calls for Prosecution of Jack Smith After Congressional Testimony
China Considers New Rules to Limit Purchases of Foreign AI Chips Amid Growing Demand
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
Trump Administration Launches Immigration Enforcement Operation in Maine Amid Political Tensions
Trump Says Greenland Framework Deal Gives U.S. “Everything It Wanted”
Trump Reverses Course on Greenland After Diplomatic Backlash
NATO Chief Says Greenland Sovereignty Not Discussed as Trump Backs Off Tariff and Force Threats
Minnesota U.S. Citizen Detained by ICE in Armed Raid Sparks Outrage and Civil Rights Concerns 



