The United States has officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant shift in global health policy that experts warn could harm public health both domestically and worldwide. The decision follows a year of escalating warnings from health leaders and international officials who argued that leaving the United Nations health agency would weaken global disease surveillance and response systems.
President Donald Trump initiated the withdrawal on the first day of his presidency in 2025 through an executive order, citing what the administration described as the WHO’s failures in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a joint press release from the U.S. Departments of Health and State, the United States will no longer participate fully in WHO activities and has no plans to rejoin or even serve as an observer. Instead, the U.S. intends to collaborate directly with individual countries on public health priorities, including disease monitoring and emergency response.
A key point of contention involves unpaid membership fees. Under U.S. law, the country was expected to provide one year’s notice and settle approximately $260 million in outstanding dues before exiting. However, State Department officials dispute that payment is a legal prerequisite for withdrawal, arguing that American taxpayers have already contributed sufficiently. The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that all U.S. funding to the WHO has ended, stating the organization’s actions had cost the U.S. trillions of dollars.
The withdrawal has already triggered major consequences. The U.S. flag was removed from WHO headquarters in Geneva, and the agency has entered a financial crisis. As its largest donor, contributing about 18% of total funding, the U.S. exit has forced the WHO to cut its management team, reduce budgets, and plan to lay off roughly a quarter of its staff by mid-year.
Global health leaders, including WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and Gates Foundation chair Bill Gates, have urged the U.S. to reconsider. While a quick return appears unlikely, experts stress that the absence of U.S. leadership could weaken international cooperation and increase risks to global health security.


Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Trump Extends AGOA Trade Program for Africa Through 2026, Supporting Jobs and U.S.-Africa Trade
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Trump Administration Expands Global Gag Rule, Restricting U.S. Foreign Aid to Diversity and Gender Programs
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
ICE Blocked From Entering Ecuador Consulate in Minneapolis During Immigration Operation
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
NATO to Discuss Strengthening Greenland Security Amid Arctic Tensions
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Marco Rubio Steps Down as Acting U.S. Archivist Amid Federal Law Limits
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters 



