U.S. President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration is withdrawing National Guard troops from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, while warning that federal forces could return if crime rates rise again. The decision follows months of legal challenges and criticism from local leaders who argued the deployments were unnecessary and unlawful.
In a social media post, Trump claimed crime had been “greatly reduced” due to the presence of the National Guard and described the troops as “great Patriots.” He added that federal forces would “come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form,” should crime increase in the future. The announcement came as courts continued to question the legality of the deployments.
Local officials and Democratic leaders in the affected cities have consistently accused the Trump administration of federal overreach, saying it exaggerated isolated incidents of violence to justify sending troops. Judges overseeing lawsuits filed by cities ruled that the federal government overstepped its authority and failed to prove that National Guard deployments were necessary to protect federal property or personnel from protesters.
The legal pressure intensified when a federal appellate court ruled that hundreds of California National Guard troops must be returned to Governor Gavin Newsom’s control. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois, stating that presidential authority to federalize the Guard likely applies only in “exceptional” circumstances. The court noted that the administration failed to identify a lawful basis for using the military to execute laws in the state.
Newsom’s office responded sharply to Trump’s announcement, calling it a political retreat driven by court rulings. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s office also pushed back, sharing 2025 data showing violent crime in the city fell to its lowest level in more than a decade, down 21.3% from 2024.
Trump initially began deploying troops in June amid protests over his strict immigration policies and increased deportation efforts. He also sent forces to Washington, D.C., asserting that crime was rampant, despite local statistics suggesting otherwise. Military officials have since been scaling back the deployments as ongoing litigation left their status uncertain, marking another chapter in the debate over federal authority, public safety, and the role of the National Guard in U.S. cities.


Lockheed Martin Secures $92.8M AEGIS Sustainment Contract from U.S. Navy
FBI Surges Resources to Minnesota Amid Fraud Investigations Linked to Somali Community
Ukraine Drone Attacks Target Moscow and Western Russia, Injure One Civilian
FDA Approves Mitapivat for Anemia in Thalassemia Patients
FTC Praises Instacart for Ending AI Pricing Tests After $60M Settlement
California Regulator Probes Waymo Robotaxi Stalls During San Francisco Power Outage
Australia Orders Independent Review After Bondi Mass Shooting, Albanese Resists Royal Commission Calls
U.S. Shifts Strategy Toward Economic Pressure With Venezuelan Oil Quarantine
Zelenskiy Says Ukraine Seeks Strong Peace Deal, Rejects “Weak” Agreement in New Year Address
Philippines Challenges Chinese Research Vessel Spotted Near Cagayan Coast
U.S. Government Agrees to Review Frozen NIH Diversity Research Grants After Legal Challenge
Kremlin Says Ukrainian Drone Attack Hardens Russia’s Stance on Peace Talks
Trump Administration Clarifies Minnesota Childcare Funding Status Amid Fraud Claims
NSW Passes Toughest Gun and Anti-Terror Laws After Bondi Beach Shooting
Najib Razak Files Appeal Against Latest 1MDB Corruption Conviction and 15-Year Sentence
China to Tighten Crude Steel Output Controls and Export Regulation Through 2030
Australia Moves Toward Tougher Gun Laws After Bondi Shooting 



