Canada’s local food system faces major roadblocks without urgent policy changes 
Merck Nears Acquisition of Cidara Therapeutics at Significant Premium 
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit 
U.S. Homeland Security Ends TSA Union Contract, Prompting Legal Challenge 
Office design isn’t keeping up with post-COVID work styles - here’s what workers really want 
Cogent Biosciences Soars 120% on Breakthrough Phase 3 Results for Bezuclastinib in GIST Treatment 
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe 
U.S. Experts to Reassess Newborn Hepatitis B Vaccination Guidelines Amid Growing Debate 
Major Drugmakers Slash U.S. Prices and Sell Directly to Patients Amid Trump’s Push for Affordable Medicines 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
DOJ Sues Loudoun County School Board Over Transgender Locker Room Policy 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest 
Novartis to Acquire Avidity Biosciences for $12 Billion to Strengthen Rare Muscle Disorder Portfolio 
Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge 
China to Add Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro to National Health Insurance in 2025 
Coca-Cola faces lawsuit over "good for you" Minute Maid juice claims. U.S. District Judge questions health implications while FDA lacks sugar intake guidelines. The outcome could reshape industry advertising standards.
Reynolds, who says fruit juices increase the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes, argues that Coca-Cola exploits and perpetuates the misperception that juice is healthy by marketing and labeling its Minute Maid juice boxes as being "Good for You!" and "Part of a Healthy, Balanced Diet." The company sought to dismiss the claims in a recent hearing.
During the hearing, Steven Zalesin, an attorney representing Coca-Cola, pointed out that the "good for you" claims on the juice boxes were part of implied and explicit nutrient claims allowed under FDA rules. Zalesin claimed that the messaging was not misleading as the packaging explicitly mentions zero added sugar and the presence of vitamin C, with accompanying information on its health benefits.
However, U.S. District Judge Vincent Chhabria appeared skeptical of Coca-Cola's arguments, suggesting that the messaging on the packaging implies that the juice actively contributes to a healthy diet. Zalesin countered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture's position that 100% fruit juice without added sugars can be part of a healthy dietary pattern.
Chhabria raised concerns that consumers might interpret the pictures of fruit on the juice box as indicating that drinking the juice is as healthy as eating fruit. Paul Joseph, counsel to the plaintiff, argued that using the word "healthy" to advertise a product should be subject to higher standards.
The lawsuit raises important questions about the health claims made by food and beverage manufacturers. The FDA's absence of guidelines on "maximum or correct" daily sugar intake complicates the case. The final decision will shape how companies can market and advertise their products based on nutrient content claims.
As the legal battle continues, consumers remain wary of such claims and the overall impact on their health. With increasing awareness of the potential risks associated with consuming fruit juice, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for the industry.
Photo: himanshu Chaudhary/Unsplash
