The United States has sharply criticized South Africa’s recent decision to expel Israel’s top diplomat, calling the move politically motivated and harmful to diplomatic norms. The condemnation was delivered on Tuesday by U.S. State Department Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott, who said the action reflects what Washington views as South Africa prioritizing “grievance politics” over constructive international engagement.
In a statement posted on X, Pigott argued that expelling a diplomat for publicly criticizing the African National Congress’s alleged ties to Hamas and other antisemitic groups undermines open dialogue and damages South Africa’s national interests. According to the U.S., such a step risks further isolating Pretoria at a time of already heightened geopolitical tension. South Africa’s embassy in Washington has so far declined to comment on the remarks.
The diplomatic dispute escalated last Friday when South Africa declared Israel’s senior diplomat persona non grata, ordering him to leave the country within 72 hours. South African officials accused the diplomat of unacceptable violations of diplomatic norms, including making remarks they said insulted President Cyril Ramaphosa. The move marked a significant downturn in already strained Israel–South Africa relations.
Israel responded swiftly by expelling South Africa’s senior diplomatic representative, signaling a tit-for-tat escalation that underscores the depth of the rift between the two nations. Relations have been deteriorating since South Africa filed a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice in 2024 over Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.
That case has drawn global attention, with several human rights organizations, legal experts, and scholars characterizing Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. Israel has strongly rejected those claims, maintaining that its military operations are acts of self-defense following the October 2023 Hamas-led attack.
The legal challenge has also strained South Africa’s relationship with the United States. President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized Pretoria over the case, coupling his rhetoric with trade sanctions and an executive order last year that cut U.S. funding to South Africa. As diplomatic tensions continue to mount, analysts warn that the dispute could have lasting implications for regional stability and international relations.


Trump Calls for “Nationalizing” Voting, Drawing Backlash Over Election Authority
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry
Russia Prepares for Post–New START Era as U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Control Nears Collapse
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Bill and Hillary Clinton Agree to Testify in Epstein Investigation
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Israel Reopens Rafah Crossing, Offering Limited Relief to Gaza Patients Amid Ceasefire Efforts
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Trump Says U.S.–Iran Talks Continue as Military Tensions Remain High
Medvedev Warns World Is Growing More Dangerous but Says Russia Seeks to Avoid Global Conflict
Costa Rica Election: Laura Fernandez Wins Presidency as PPSO Secures Congressional Majority
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive
Stephen Miran Resigns as White House Economic Adviser Amid Federal Reserve Tenure
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 



