Palantir's Maven AI Earns Pentagon "Program of Record" Status, Reshaping Military AI Strategy 
US-Iran Ceasefire Talks Underway: What You Need to Know 
ICE Arrest of Guatemalan Woman at San Francisco Airport Sparks Outrage 
Costco Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds as Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump's IEEPA Tariffs 
Iran Demands Lebanon Be Part of Any Ceasefire Deal With Israel and the U.S. 
Judge Dismisses Sam Altman Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, But Sister Can Refile 
Taiwan Arms Deal on Track Despite U.S.-China Summit Uncertainty 
CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Dispute Escalates as Arbitration Claims Surpass $2 Billion 
U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Gain Momentum Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court 
Trump Administration Quietly Approves $7 Billion in Unannounced Weapons Sales to UAE 
Bolsonaro Hospitalized in ICU with Bronchopneumonia Amid Calls for House Arrest 
Cyberattack on Stryker Triggers U.S. Government Warning Over Microsoft Intune Security 
Trump Administration Opens Two New Investigations Into Harvard Over Discrimination and Antisemitism 
TSA Absences Surge During Government Shutdown as ICE Agents Prepare Airport Deployment 
U.S. Appeals Court Strikes Down FTC Order Against TurboTax "Free" Advertising 
Two federal judges have ruled that President Donald Trump’s administration cannot suspend food assistance for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown. The rulings, issued in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, require the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to use available contingency funds to continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps.
The decisions come after lawsuits filed by Democratic-led states, cities, and advocacy groups challenged the administration’s plan to halt SNAP payments starting November 1. U.S. District Judges John McConnell and Indira Talwani, both appointed by former President Barack Obama, determined that the USDA’s refusal to use its $5.25 billion contingency fund was unjustified and would cause “irreparable harm” to millions of low-income Americans.
Judge McConnell emphasized that withholding aid was “arbitrary,” urging the USDA to release emergency funds immediately. He also suggested that if the contingency fund proves insufficient, the agency could explore using other federal reserves estimated at $23 billion. Judge Talwani agreed, stating that the administration misinterpreted the law by claiming it lacked authority to use the contingency funds during the shutdown.
The USDA, however, has maintained that it does not have adequate funding to provide full benefits to the 42 million Americans relying on SNAP, which costs up to $9 billion monthly. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins argued that Democrats’ claims about available funding were misleading, saying the contingency funds require congressional approval before they can be used.
Despite the administration’s legal concerns, both judges ordered the government to find a way to continue distributing benefits. The White House must report its compliance plan by Monday. SNAP provides essential food assistance to Americans earning less than 130% of the federal poverty line, making this ruling crucial for millions struggling with food insecurity.
