A federal judge has rejected a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, delivering a significant win for the administration’s immigration policy agenda. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled that the fee falls within the president’s broad authority to regulate immigration, dismissing arguments from major U.S. business and academic groups.
The lawsuit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, along with the Association of American Universities. The groups argued that the Trump administration overstepped its legal authority when it issued a September proclamation imposing the steep fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They claimed the measure would harm U.S. businesses, universities, and the broader economy by making it more difficult and expensive to attract global talent.
Judge Howell disagreed, concluding that existing immigration laws grant the president wide discretion to set conditions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States. In her ruling, she emphasized that Congress has historically delegated significant power to the executive branch in matters related to immigration and national borders. As a result, the court found that the administration acted within its legal rights when it implemented the H-1B visa fee.
The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare, and academia. Supporters of the fee argue it helps protect American jobs and ensures that companies prioritize domestic workers. Critics, however, warn that the policy could discourage innovation, increase labor shortages, and reduce the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and research institutions.
The ruling marks an important development in ongoing debates over U.S. immigration policy, skilled worker visas, and executive authority. While opponents may consider further legal action or legislative solutions, the decision reinforces the Trump administration’s ability to use immigration tools, including fees and restrictions, to shape labor and economic policy.


Zelenskiy Says Ukraine Peace Talks With U.S. and Europe Near Breakthrough
US and Japan Fast-Track $550 Billion Strategic Investment Initiative
California Regulator Probes Waymo Robotaxi Stalls During San Francisco Power Outage
Sydney Bondi Beach Terror Attack Kills 16, Sparks Gun Law and Security Debate
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims
DOJ Releases New Epstein Files Detailing Alleged Trump Flights on Private Jet
Putin Aide Says European, Ukrainian Changes Fail to Improve Ukraine Peace Prospects
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland
Trump Taps Former DHS Official Troy Edgar for U.S. Ambassador Role in El Salvador
U.S. Pledges Maximum Sanctions on Venezuela Amid Rising Global Tensions
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling
South Korean Court Clears Korea Zinc’s $7.4 Billion U.S. Smelter Project, Shares Surge 



