U.S. Budget Airlines Seek $2.5 Billion Government Aid Amid Rising Jet Fuel Costs 
Trump-Xi Beijing Summit to Focus on Trade, Taiwan, and Boeing Deal 
Pentagon Defies Court Order on Press Access, Judge Rules 
U.S. Flags Vietnam as “Priority Foreign Country” Over Intellectual Property Concerns 
Trump Administration Dismisses Entire National Science Board, Sparking Debate Over Scientific Independence 
Panama Defends Port Takeover Amid U.S.-China Tensions and Canal Dispute 
Arm Stock Drops Despite Strong AI Chip Demand and Earnings Beat 
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone 
New York Moves to Ban Masked Law Enforcement During Immigration Operations 
White House Withdraws Trump’s National Park Service Nominee Amid Criticism 
Israel’s Secret Iraq Base Allegedly Supported Iran Air Campaign, WSJ Reports 
Agentic AI Boom to Drive Massive Growth in CPU Market, UBS Says 
Iran Accuses U.S. of Violating Strait of Hormuz Ceasefire with Ship and Coastal Attacks 
US Reviews Mexican Consulates Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions 
Apple Explores Intel and Samsung Partnerships to Diversify Chip Supply Chain 
RFK Jr. Expands CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel's Scope Amid Legal Battles 
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case 
A federal judge has temporarily blocked Virginia from enforcing a new social media law designed to protect children from online addiction, ruling that it likely violates First Amendment rights. The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over age verification laws and youth access to social media platforms.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles in Alexandria issued a preliminary injunction against Senate Bill 854, a law signed by former Governor Glenn Youngkin in May 2025 that took effect on January 1, 2026. The legislation required social media companies to verify users’ ages and restricted minors under 16 to just one hour of daily use.
The lawsuit was filed by NetChoice, a technology trade association representing major platforms including Google, Meta, Netflix, Reddit, and Elon Musk’s X. The group argued that the Virginia social media law infringed on free speech rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.
In her ruling, Judge Giles stated that while Virginia has a compelling interest in addressing the youth mental health crisis and the addictive features of social media, the law was both overly broad and inconsistent. She noted that the measure required age verification for all users, including adults, making it overinclusive. At the same time, it excluded certain interactive gaming platforms that may also have addictive features, rendering it underinclusive.
The judge further pointed out that the law restricted minors from viewing more than an hour of content on topics such as science, history, or religious programming on social media platforms, even though similar content remained accessible on streaming services.
Virginia officials said they remain committed to enforcing laws that help parents protect children from online harms. Meanwhile, NetChoice welcomed the decision, emphasizing that the government cannot limit access to lawful speech, even with good intentions.
