Iran Proposes Strait of Hormuz Reopening Deal Amid Stalled U.S. Talks 
U.S. Raises Alarm Over Chinese AI Firms’ Alleged IP Theft Through Model Distillation 
King Charles and Queen Camilla Visit the U.S. Amid Political Tensions and Historic Milestone 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
White House Withdraws Trump’s National Park Service Nominee Amid Criticism 
Russian Drone Strike on Odesa Injures Civilians and Damages Key Infrastructure 
US Freezes $344M in Crypto Linked to Iran Amid Escalating Sanctions 
US Envoy Urges Taiwan to Approve Defense Budget Amid Rising China Tensions 
U.S. Warns Allies Over Alleged Chinese AI IP Theft Linked to DeepSeek 
Trump Administration Files Fraud Charges Against Southern Poverty Law Center Over Informant Payments 
USDA Plans to Expand Farmer Surveys to Improve Crop Report Accuracy 
Erdogan Condemns White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooting, Voices Support for Trump 
China Conducts Live-Fire Drills Near Luzon as U.S.-Philippines Balikatan Exercises Expand 
U.S. Budget Airlines Seek $2.5 Billion Government Aid Amid Rising Jet Fuel Costs 
Syrian Asylum Rejections Rise in Europe as Minority Safety Concerns Persist 
U.S. Allows Iran Players in 2026 World Cup but Bars IRGC-Linked Individuals 
Starmer Faces Political Pressure as Mandelson Appointment Controversy Impacts UK Markets 
The Trump administration has removed all members of the National Science Board, a major advisory group that oversees the National Science Foundation (NSF), according to statements from two former board members. The decision impacts more than 20 experts and has raised concerns about the future of independent scientific governance in the United States.
The National Science Board, established in 1950, plays a vital role in guiding U.S. science and engineering policy. Its members are typically appointed for six-year terms and come from diverse backgrounds, including academia, industry, nonprofits, and national laboratories. The board also advises both the president and Congress on key issues related to scientific research and innovation.
Yolanda Gil of the University of Southern California and Keivan Stassun of Vanderbilt University confirmed that all 22 members received an email on Friday notifying them of their immediate termination. Both stated that no reason was provided for the sudden dismissal. Gil highlighted the board’s diverse expertise, while Stassun noted that, although disappointing, the move was not entirely unexpected.
Experts believe the action reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration, which began in early 2025, to reshape independent institutions. Critics argue that removing experienced board members and potentially replacing them with political allies could weaken objective scientific oversight and reduce critical input in policymaking.
The National Science Foundation referred questions to the White House. A White House official responded by suggesting that the board’s authority, established decades ago, may need to be updated. The official also emphasized that the NSF’s operations will continue without interruption.
This development has intensified discussions about the role of independent scientific bodies in the U.S., particularly their importance in ensuring unbiased, evidence-based policy decisions in science and technology.
