US Signals Openness to New Trade Deal as Brazil Shows Willingness, Says USTR Greer 
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips 
Gold Prices Dip as Markets Absorb Dovish Fed Outlook; Silver Eases After Record High 
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
Fed Rate Cut Signals Balance Between Inflation and Jobs, Says Mary Daly 
Wall Street Futures Dip as Broadcom Slides, Tech Weighed Down Despite Dovish Fed Signals 
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns 
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute 
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 
GameStop Misses Q3 Revenue Estimates as Digital Shift Pressures Growth 
Gulf Sovereign Funds Unite in Paramount–Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
Westpac Director Peter Nash Avoids Major Investor Backlash Amid ASX Scrutiny 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
S&P 500 Slides as AI Chip Stocks Tumble, Cooling Tech Rally 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO 
Subway has been placed in a difficult situation after The New York Times released its lab test report on the sandwich chain’s Subway tuna product. It was said that the publication initiated the lab test due to the company’s lawsuits.
As per Fox Business, a 60-inch Subway tuna sandwich was tested at a lab and the result stated that “no amplifiable tuna DNA was present” in the food item. This means that the lab analysis failed to find or identify any tuna DNA in the food.
The tuna sandwich test
Subway has been wrapped up in some lawsuits regarding its sandwiches. Customers have different complaints but there was a customer who said that the tuna in the tuna sandwich is not the fish that everyone knows. In simpler words, it was claimed that the tuna could not be real tuna meat.
In any case, in The New York Times report, it said that it brought sandwiches from three different Subway outlets around Los Angeles for testing. This was done after a customer filed a lawsuit earlier this year, claiming the tuna fish is made from "a mixture of various concoctions."
For the lab test, the tuna was frozen and was brought to the lab. It was mentioned that a PCR test was done to determine if the tuna from Subway’s sandwiches is one of the five tuna species. However, the lab could not identify which species because it did not find tuna DNA at all.
It is fake tuna?
Then again, it cannot be assumed that Subway is using fake tuna in its sandwiches. In fact, this may not be the truth because it was explained that there are two possible reasons why the tuna DNA was not detected.
"One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an identification,” the lab’s spokesman told The New York Times. “Or we got some and there’s just nothing there that’s tuna."
On the other hand, some experts said that it is also possible that the DNA disappeared when tuna was cooked. Because in this process, the protein breaks down and this makes it difficult to spot the DNA.
