Asian Currencies Stay Muted as Dollar Holds Firm Amid Iran Uncertainty 
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Explosion Prompts $1M Lawsuit Over Worker Safety Negligence 
Bank of Japan Officials Signal Continued Interest Rate Hikes Amid Inflation Concerns 
Wall Street Slides as Iran War Uncertainty, Oil Surge, and AI Fears Rattle Markets 
Lynas Rare Earths Signs Vietnam Deal with LS Eco Energy to Boost Magnet Metal Production 
Sonova Shares Slip as Hearing Aid Giant Lowers Growth Outlook and Plans Sennheiser Exit 
Reflection AI Eyes $25 Billion Valuation in Massive $2.5 Billion Funding Round 
Japan Eyes Oil Futures Intervention to Stabilize Yen Amid Middle East Crisis 
Google's TurboQuant Algorithm Sends Memory Chip Stocks Tumbling 
Iran Allows Oil Tankers Through Strait of Hormuz Amid U.S. Negotiations 
Asian Markets Rally as Oil Prices Tumble and Middle East Peace Hopes Emerge 
Currency Markets Show Caution Amid U.S.-Iran Negotiations 
Merck's $6 Billion Bid for Terns Pharma Signals Bold Oncology Push 
Oil Prices Slip as Middle East Tensions Ease, Heading for Weekly Loss 
SK Hynix Eyes Up to $14 Billion U.S. IPO to Fund AI Chip Expansion 
Time to buy local: war fuel price shocks reveal the folly of a long food supply chain 
Subway has been placed in a difficult situation after The New York Times released its lab test report on the sandwich chain’s Subway tuna product. It was said that the publication initiated the lab test due to the company’s lawsuits.
As per Fox Business, a 60-inch Subway tuna sandwich was tested at a lab and the result stated that “no amplifiable tuna DNA was present” in the food item. This means that the lab analysis failed to find or identify any tuna DNA in the food.
The tuna sandwich test
Subway has been wrapped up in some lawsuits regarding its sandwiches. Customers have different complaints but there was a customer who said that the tuna in the tuna sandwich is not the fish that everyone knows. In simpler words, it was claimed that the tuna could not be real tuna meat.
In any case, in The New York Times report, it said that it brought sandwiches from three different Subway outlets around Los Angeles for testing. This was done after a customer filed a lawsuit earlier this year, claiming the tuna fish is made from "a mixture of various concoctions."
For the lab test, the tuna was frozen and was brought to the lab. It was mentioned that a PCR test was done to determine if the tuna from Subway’s sandwiches is one of the five tuna species. However, the lab could not identify which species because it did not find tuna DNA at all.
It is fake tuna?
Then again, it cannot be assumed that Subway is using fake tuna in its sandwiches. In fact, this may not be the truth because it was explained that there are two possible reasons why the tuna DNA was not detected.
"One, it’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an identification,” the lab’s spokesman told The New York Times. “Or we got some and there’s just nothing there that’s tuna."
On the other hand, some experts said that it is also possible that the DNA disappeared when tuna was cooked. Because in this process, the protein breaks down and this makes it difficult to spot the DNA.
