The Trump administration is facing strong backlash from China hawks and Democratic lawmakers after authorizing Nvidia, AMD, and Intel to sell advanced AI chips—specifically Nvidia’s H200—to China. President Donald Trump announced the decision on social media, noting that the U.S. would collect a 25% fee on each sale. Critics argue the move could give Beijing access to technology capable of accelerating its military AI programs.
Brad Carson, former Under Secretary of the Army, warned that the policy “puts our competitive edge up for sale,” emphasizing that China could eventually integrate U.S.-made AI chips into its military systems. Many national security officials see the authorization as a major strategic risk at a time when U.S.–China technological competition is intensifying.
This policy represents a dramatic departure from Trump’s first term, when he aggressively restricted Chinese access to key U.S. technologies, citing intellectual property theft and military concerns. The current administration, guided by White House AI czar David Sacks, argues that allowing controlled chip sales may actually slow the rise of Chinese competitors like Huawei. Sacks claims that if Chinese-designed AI chips dominate global markets within a few years, it would signal a major loss for American leadership.
However, former NSA and Homeland Security official Stewart Baker called that logic unrealistic, stating China will never stop pursuing a fully domestic AI chip industry. Democratic lawmakers echoed the criticism. Senator Ron Wyden accused Trump of being “taken to the cleaners by China yet again,” while Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi labeled the decision “a profound national security mistake.”
China responded by urging the U.S. to maintain stable supply chains, with embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu expressing hope for constructive actions from Washington. Some analysts, including Chinese military expert James Mulvenon, believe any short-term benefits for China will be temporary, as Beijing’s long-term strategy is to eliminate reliance on Western technology.
The debate underscores growing tension between economic strategy, national security, and technological dominance as the United States navigates its evolving relationship with China.


FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Trump Appoints Colin McDonald as Assistant Attorney General for National Fraud Enforcement
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate
Faith Leaders Arrested on Capitol Hill During Protest Against Trump Immigration Policies and ICE Funding
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 



