Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality 
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales 
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify 
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks 
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns 
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions 
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University 
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links 
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out 
House Speaker Mike Johnson has declined President Joe Biden's request for additional funding for Ukraine, stating that he will await guidance from President-elect Donald Trump before proceeding.
Awaiting New Leadership
President Biden recently sought congressional approval for a $24 billion aid package to support Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia. However, Speaker Johnson emphasized the importance of deferring such decisions to the incoming administration. He remarked, "It is not the place of Joe Biden to make that decision now; we have a newly elected president, and we are going to wait and take the new commander in chief’s direction on all that."
Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy
This decision introduces uncertainty regarding the continuity of U.S. support for Ukraine. The delay in funding could impact Ukraine's defense capabilities and alter the dynamics of its conflict with Russia. Additionally, this move reflects a broader shift in U.S. foreign policy, as the incoming administration may reassess existing commitments and strategies.
Public Reaction
The Speaker's decision has ignited a spectrum of reactions on social media:
-
@PatriotVoice: "Finally, leadership that respects the will of the incoming administration. Biden's overreach needed checking."
-
@DemocracyDefender: "Delaying aid to Ukraine endangers lives and undermines our commitments to allies. This is reckless."
-
@PolicyWonk: "Deferring critical decisions to an incoming president sets a concerning precedent for transitional governance."
-
@GlobalObserver: "U.S. foreign policy requires consistency. This halt in aid sends mixed signals to both allies and adversaries."
-
@Constitutionalist: "The current president retains full authority until the transition. Johnson's stance is constitutionally questionable."
-
@HumanRightsAdvocate: "Ukraine's struggle is a fight for democracy. U.S. support shouldn't be a partisan issue subject to delays."
Historical Context
Historically, U.S. foreign aid decisions during presidential transitions have aimed to maintain stability and uphold international commitments. However, Speaker Johnson's approach indicates a departure from this norm, potentially signaling a reevaluation of foreign aid priorities under the forthcoming administration.
