A federal judge in Missouri on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Republican-led state that accused Starbucks of using its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) commitments as a pretext for unlawful discrimination based on race, gender, and sexual orientation. The ruling marks a significant legal setback for efforts to challenge corporate diversity policies through the courts.
U.S. District Judge John Ross, who presides in St. Louis, ruled that Missouri failed to demonstrate that Starbucks discriminated against even a single Missouri resident who either worked for the company or applied for a job. In his decision, Ross emphasized that allegations alone were insufficient and that the state did not provide concrete evidence of harm or discriminatory action tied directly to Starbucks’ hiring, promotion, or compensation practices. Ross was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama.
The lawsuit was brought by the office of Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, a Republican, and had been initiated by her predecessor, Andrew Bailey, before he left to join the Trump administration as co-deputy director of the FBI. The state argued that Starbucks unlawfully linked executive compensation to racial and gender-based hiring goals and implemented what it described as quotas. It also accused the company of providing special training and advancement opportunities to certain demographic groups and of maintaining diversity targets for its board of directors.
Starbucks and the Missouri Attorney General’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment following the ruling. The case targeted policies Starbucks adopted after 2020, when the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer sparked nationwide protests and prompted many corporations to reassess diversity and inclusion strategies.
The decision comes amid a broader political push by President Donald Trump to curb DEI initiatives across the federal government, education systems, and the private sector. Several major companies, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Amazon, and Target, have publicly scaled back DEI programs, although some have continued such efforts quietly.
Starbucks employs more than 200,000 people in the United States and about 360,000 globally. The Missouri case echoed a similar challenge dismissed in 2023 by a federal judge in Washington state, who ruled that disputes over corporate diversity policies are matters for lawmakers and businesses rather than courts.


UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Novo Nordisk Warns of Profit Decline as Wegovy Faces U.S. Price Pressure and Rising Competition
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions
Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis
U.S. Justice Department Removes DHS Lawyer After Blunt Remarks in Minnesota Immigration Court
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Could Expand as Ukraine Peace Talks Continue, Says Treasury Secretary Bessent 



