Norway supports the push for joint training programs for Ukrainian pilots to fly F-16 jets. This follows the endorsement by the United States for the training programs with Ukraine, assuring that the jets will not be used to enter Russian territory.
On Wednesday, Norwegian defense minister Bjoern Arrild Gram said that Oslo is willing to support the initiative of joint training programs for Ukrainian pilots to fly the F-16s. Gram added that the Norwegian government is also considering how to provide more support along with Ukraine’s allies and partners. Separately, Gram told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that Oslo has yet to decide whether to provide Ukraine with any of its F-16s.
This follows the endorsement by US President Joe Biden on Friday last week of the joint training programs for Ukrainian pilots on the F-16 jets. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has assured that the jets would not be used to make incursions into Russian territory.
On Thursday, the US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, said that Washington has long asked Ukraine not to use US weapons inside Russian territory. Milley’s comments follow Moscow’s accusations that pro-Ukrainian militia were using US armored vehicles. Milley added that his office was looking into the photos that showed the vehicles that were allegedly used in the cross-border incursion in Russia’s Belgorod region.
However, Milley said that the US position against the use of US equipment in Russia was clear to Ukraine.
On the same day, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller told reporters that Washington condemns the agreement between Russia and Belarus to formally deploy Russian tactical missiles into Belarusian territory. Despite the deployment of weapons, Miller added that there was still no reason to adjust its nuclear posture.
“It’s the latest example of irresponsible behavior that we have seen from Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine over a year ago,” said Miller, reiterating the US warning that using chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons in the war would have “severe consequences.” Miller did not specify what consequences there would be should there have been such use in the war.
Photo: Chandler Cruttenden / Unsplash (CC by 2.0)


FEMA Reinstates $1 Billion Disaster Prevention Grant Program After Court Order
Bachelet Pushes Forward With UN Secretary-General Bid Despite Chile's Withdrawal
U.S. Deploys Elite 82nd Airborne Troops to Middle East Amid Iran Tensions
Iran-U.S. Negotiations: Tehran Reviews American Peace Proposal Amid Ongoing Gulf Conflict
Jay Bhattacharya to Continue Leading CDC as White House Searches for Permanent Director
US Accelerates Taiwan Arms Deliveries Amid Rising China Threat
Iran-Israel Missile Strikes Continue Amid Mixed Signals on U.S.-Iran Diplomacy
Kristi Noem Ends Western Hemisphere Tour in Diminished Role After DHS Firing
Israel Eyes Litani River as New Border Amid Escalating Lebanon Offensive
Taiwan Arms Deal on Track Despite U.S.-China Summit Uncertainty
WTO Reform Talks Begin in Cameroon Amid Global Trade Tensions
Trump Votes by Mail Despite Calling It "Cheating" as Democrat Wins Mar-a-Lago District
Trump Administration Settles Lawsuit Barring Federal Agencies from Pressuring Social Media Censorship
Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court
Trump to Visit China in May for High-Stakes Xi Summit Amid Iran War
Trump Seeks Quick End to U.S.-Iran Conflict Amid Ongoing Middle East Tensions
US-Iran Ceasefire Talks Underway: What You Need to Know 



