Gold Price Rises as Softer Dollar and Fed Rate Expectations Boost Bullion Demand 
China Services PMI Beats Forecasts as Strong Demand Supports June Growth 
U.S. Dollar Drops as Weak Jobs Data Boosts Fed Pause Bets, Yen Jumps on Intervention Talk 
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures 
California Court Dismisses Trump Administration Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Sanctuary Policy 
Goldman Sachs Says China Competition Weighs More on EU Growth Than Trade Deficit 
Russia Stocks End Flat at Three-Year Low as MOEX Index Stalls, Gold Prices Climb 
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge 
Gold Price Surges Above $4,120 as Weak US Jobs Data Lowers Fed Rate Hike Expectations 
Wall Street Ends Mixed as Weak Jobs Data Lowers Fed Rate Hike Bets, Chip Stocks Tumble 
Pedro Sanchez’s Wife Ordered to Stand Trial in Spain Corruption Case 
Trump Threatens ABC News Lawsuit Over Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Coverage 
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court 
South Korea Warns Won Is Undervalued, Boosts FX Coordination With Japan 
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Law Enforcement Mask Ban 
Turkey Vehicle Sales Fall 11.4% in June as Auto Market Weakens 
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a 2016 verdict finding Oracle liable for $3 billion for violating agreements on settlement and software development with Hewlett-Packard Co.
The 2010 settlement resolved a trade secrets case brought by HP after its former CEO Mike Hurd was hired by Oracle.
Furthermore, Oracle breached a provision in the agreement requiring it to continue to offer its software on HP’s Itanium server platform.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co spokesperson Adam Bauer said they were "incredibly pleased" with the ruling.
Justice Allison Danner wrote for a three-judge panel, affirming a 2016 jury verdict.
HP sued Oracle in California state court in 2011 for its alleged refusal to continue offering its software months after the breach and trade secret settlement based on its hiring of Hurd.
A 2012 ruling favored HP, saying that Oracle under the agreement should continue offering the products until HP stopped selling Itanium-based servers.
A Santa Clara, California jury awarded HP over $3 billion in damages in 2016.
On appeal, Oracle argued that the agreement merely restates the voluntary, non-contractual relationship between the two firms.
But Danner and Justices Mary Greenwood and Franklin Elia said that based on the agreement's plain language, the parties' previous dealing, and the surrounding circumstances required Oracle to continue to offer its products as long as HP continued to sell the platform.
Danner also upheld the jury award that included lost profits based on an expert opinion on HP's potential market share loss.
Hewlett-Packard was represented by a Gibson Dunn & Crutcher team led by Theodore Boutros. The firm didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, Margaret Grignon of the Grignon Law Firm and Sadik Huseny of Latham & Watkins represented Oracle.
