DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub have reached a settlement with New York City over its controversial cap on food delivery fees. The agreement, filed in Manhattan federal court, allows the companies to charge higher commissions than currently permitted—if the City Council amends the existing law as anticipated.
The law, enacted in May 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, limits delivery app charges to restaurants at 15% for deliveries and 5% for marketing and other services. Initially introduced as a temporary relief measure, it became permanent in August 2021, prompting the three companies to file a lawsuit the following month.
The food delivery giants argued that the caps were unconstitutional, depriving them of their right to freely negotiate contracts and forcing them to operate at significant financial losses. They claimed hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue due to the city's restrictions.
In September 2023, U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods denied the city's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, allowing it to move forward. However, the new settlement—if formalized by the City Council—will lead to the dismissal of the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
The original law aimed to protect New York City’s struggling restaurant sector, which faced mass closures and job cuts during the pandemic. City officials argued that high delivery fees could lead to further economic fallout.
The outcome could set a precedent, as other cities like San Francisco also imposed permanent delivery commission caps. Neither the companies nor city representatives have commented publicly on the settlement.
This development highlights the ongoing tension between local regulation and gig economy platforms navigating pandemic-era policy changes and evolving business models.


Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Investment Faces Internal Doubts, Report Says
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Bob Iger Plans Early Exit as Disney Board Prepares CEO Succession Vote
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Saks Global to End Saks on Amazon Partnership Amid Bankruptcy Restructuring
Hyundai Motor Lets Russia Plant Buyback Option Expire Amid Ongoing Ukraine War
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling
SpaceX Seeks FCC Approval for Massive Solar-Powered Satellite Network to Support AI Data Centers
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
Disney Board Nears CEO Decision as Josh D’Amaro Emerges as Leading Candidate 



