President Donald Trump is known for attacking his political enemies on Twitter, and later on, signed an executive order on social media sites. Now, a new lawsuit has come up against the order, claiming that it violates the first amendment.
The Verge reports that the Center for Democracy and Technology or the CDT, who filed the lawsuit, claimed that Trump’s Executive Order was done in retaliation of Twitter’s use of the First Amendment right to be able to moderate the messages Trump posts on the social media site. As Trump’s order attacked Twitter, the CDT further reasoned that this would end up keeping social media platforms from exercising its rights to free speech nor moderate Trump’s posts in fear of retaliation.
“The President has made clear that his goal is to use threats and retaliation and future regulation to intimidate intermediaries into changing how they moderate content, essentially ensuring that the dangers of voter suppression and disinformation will grow unchecked in an election year,” said the CDT CEO Alexandra Givens in a statement.
The signing of the Executive Order comes as a few of Trump’s tweets regarding mail-in voting and voter fraud were placed under a fact-check tag. The tags linked to articles from news outlets clarifying the facts on these issues that Trump has accused several states (and the Democrats) of. By the end of May, Twitter restricted another tweet from Trump for violation of its policies of glorifying violence.
Among the social media sites that would be included in this Executive Order was Facebook. CEO Mark Zuckerberg previously spoke out against Twitter’s fact-checking policy in an interview, saying that their platforms are not in the position to do such actions. However, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey responded that it is their responsibility to also show the facts for people to be able to discern the truth for themselves. But Zuckerberg’s decision not to take any action on Trump’s Facebook post that is threatening to shoot looters has earned him backlash from civil rights leaders.
The activist leaders; Vanita Gupta, Sherrilyn Ifill, and Rashad Robison expressed their disappointment towards Zuckerberg, and said that the Facebook CEO is setting a very dangerous precedent for other people who would post harmful things on the platform. This statement came after they met with Zuckerberg and Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg on Monday.


Trump Administration Weighs Executive Order on Vaccines and Autism Research
SEC Moves to Dismiss Insider Trading Case Against Trump-Pardoned Terren Peizer
Rubio, UK’s Miliband Stress Stronger European Security Role in Washington Talks
Zelensky Urges Faster NATO Action on Air Defense Missiles
US Expects Iran-Oman Hormuz Shipping Deal Soon
Ukraine Agrees to Protect Kazakhstan Oil Exports via Black Sea
US-Backed Venezuela Government, Opposition Talks Begin
Taiwan President Lai Oversees Coastal Strike Drills in Han Kuang War Games
Trump Orders Probe Into Pentagon Munitions Stockpile Leaks After Iran Conflict
Germany Warns of Daily Hybrid Warfare Threats
Trump Unveils $3 Billion U.S. Critical Minerals Push
New Zealand MMP Electoral System Faces Fresh Referendum Debate
Joe Biden’s Prostate Cancer Has Spread Further, Hunter Biden Says
US Continues Ukraine Patriot Missile Production Talks Despite Trump Doubts
Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Democratic Senate Primary, Sets Up Key Midterm Showdown
North Korea May Deploy 120 Missiles to Russia
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas 



