Five Democratic-led states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) froze their access to more than $10 billion in federal childcare and family assistance funds. The legal challenge, filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan by California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, argues that the funding freeze is unlawful, politically motivated, and harmful to low-income families who rely on federal support programs.
The dispute began after HHS announced on Tuesday that it had restricted the states’ access to federal funds pending further review, citing concerns over alleged fraud and misuse in state-administered welfare systems. The frozen funding includes approximately $7.3 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, nearly $2.4 billion from the Child Care and Development Fund, and an additional $869 million in social services block grants. These programs are overseen by the Administration for Children and Families, a division within HHS.
According to the agency, the decision was based on what it described as “widespread fraud” and the potential that individuals who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may have improperly received benefits. The action follows a similar move a week earlier, when HHS froze $185 million in annual childcare funding allocated to Minnesota amid allegations of fraud in the state’s social services programs.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term, stating that he intends to focus on addressing the fraud controversy. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders across the affected states have strongly criticized the funding freeze. New York Governor Kathy Hochul labeled the move “vindictive,” while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker described it as “wrong and cruel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, said the administration is using essential family assistance funds as a political weapon. The lawsuit claims HHS failed to provide credible evidence supporting its fraud allegations, lacked legal authority to halt congressionally approved funding, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on Congress’s control over federal spending.


U.S. Government Agrees to Review Frozen NIH Diversity Research Grants After Legal Challenge
Senate Vote Looms on Blocking Trump’s Military Action in Venezuela
Texas App Store Age Verification Law Blocked by Federal Judge in First Amendment Ruling
Bolsonaro Discharged From Hospital and Transferred to Prison After Medical Treatment
Trump Administration Expands U.S. Visa Bond Requirement to 38 Countries
Trump Signals Possible Meeting With Venezuelan Opposition Leader as U.S. Focuses on Oil and Post-Maduro Transition
Federal Judge Upholds Trump Administration’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Trump and Petro Hold First Call Amid Rising U.S.–Colombia Tensions
Trump Administration Launches New DOJ Division to Fight Nationwide Fraud
Federal Appeals Court Blocks Trump-Era Hospital Drug Rebate Plan
EU Set to Approve Historic Mercosur Trade Deal Amid Farmer Protests
Greenland Weighs Direct U.S. Talks as Trump Renews Push for Control
U.S. Senators Push to Limit Trump’s Authority Over Greenland Amid Global Concerns
Chevron Seeks Expanded U.S. License to Boost Venezuelan Oil Exports Amid Sanctions Talks
Nicolas Maduro Pleads Not Guilty in U.S. Court After Dramatic Arrest Ordered by Trump 



