Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
South Africa Eyes ECB Repo Lines as Inflation Eases and Rate Cuts Loom 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Fed Governor Lisa Cook Warns Inflation Risks Remain as Rates Stay Steady 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Uber, the transport company, headquartered in San Francisco, California, is facing a lawsuit after the United States filed a legal case against it. The U.S. Justice Department sued Uber on Wednesday due to alleged overcharging of disabled passengers.
In the lawsuit, the US asked a federal court to order the ride-hailing company to follow the laws that protect people with disabilities from discrimination. As per Reuters, it was the Justice Department that filed the suit in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco this week.
The case looks into the Uber policy that was implemented in April 2016 where it requires extra charges for passengers that the company calls "wait time fees." This was initially followed in some cities until it was expanded and covered all states across the country.
This policy was said to be a discrimination against disabled people and violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. The suit stated that those with disabilities such as the blind and those with wheelchairs naturally need more time to get into the Uber vehicle so the policy is unfair for them.
"People with disabilities deserve equal access to all areas of community life, including the private transportation services provided by companies like Uber," Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for the DOJ's civil rights division, said in a statement. "This lawsuit seeks to bring Uber into compliance with the mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act while sending a powerful message that Uber cannot penalize passengers with disabilities simply because they need more time to get into a car."
The Justice Department simply wants the court to instruct Uber to revise its wait time fee policy and to pay damages to people who were subjected to illegal fees. The New York Times further reported that while Uber may know that disabled passengers may require at least a few minutes to get into the vehicle, it did not revise its policy to exclude the disabled for its waiting fee policy and charged them instead.
Finally, in response to the lawsuit, Uber said it has been in talks with the DOJ regarding the said rule. The company said it was only intended for riders who kept drivers waiting and not for those who needed extra time to get into the vehicle. Uber said it had refunded passengers with disabilities who informed the company about the charge.
