There is a lot to be said about today’s children who are always on their smartphones. Apparently, one nonprofit based in Colorado has had enough and is attempting to ban pre-teens from being able to buy a phone. The movement is still in its infancy and has to collect tens of thousands of signature to have an effect. If it passes, violators could face fines of up to $20,000.
The proposal comes via the group Parents Against Underage Smartphones (PAUS), which is being led by Tim Farnum who lives in Denver, Forbes reports. Farnum’s biggest gripe with regards to the use of smartphones by small children is how it affects their development, both emotionally and socially. This is where Colorado ballot initiative 29 came in, which actually started back in February.
In general, the bill is meant to force retailers to ask about the age of the customers to make sure that they are not 13 years of age or younger. If they are, the stores will not be allowed to sell them smartphones without the accompaniment of parents. Any retailer that refuses to adhere to these laws could pay fines of up to $20,000 if they become repeat offenders.
Now, it’s worth noting that the proposal does distinguish between a smartphone and a cellular phone, with the latter being allowed if the bill actually passes. Cellular phones are basic handsets that don’t have the same media capabilities as smartphones, unable to play apps or play videos.
Farnum told The Washington Post that the campaign has been gaining traction and support from parents all over the state. As expected, there has also been some pushback, especially from political figures who believe that decisions regarding the use of smartphones should be left up to the parents. Opponents of the proposal believe that this is a family matter, not a legislative one.


DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
Trump Administration to Launch Voluntary AI Standards for Frontier Models
AI Memory Chip Shortage Likely to Persist Despite Korea Investment Boom, Nomura Says
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
In a rebuke to Trump, the Supreme Court rules that birthright citizenship is the law of the land
Meta Cloud Ambitions Could Challenge AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, Says Morgan Stanley
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
California Court Dismisses Trump Administration Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Sanctuary Policy
South Korea Alleges Google Abused Android App Store Dominance, Eyes Major Fine
DOJ Orders Crackdown on Birth Tourism After Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures
Samsung to Invest $90 Billion in South Korea to Expand AI Chip, Display, and Battery Production
US Judge Seeks Explanation for DOJ’s Decision to Drop Gautam Adani Bribery Case 



