China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links 
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday 
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case 
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters 
Three major federal worker unions have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that a newly added question in federal job applications violates the U.S. Constitution. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the National Association of Government Employees (NAGE) jointly sued the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in federal court in Boston, arguing that the question unlawfully tests political loyalty.
The lawsuit targets a hiring reform implemented by OPM following a January executive order by President Donald Trump aimed at “restoring merit” to federal hiring. As part of the change, applicants are asked to respond to four essay questions—one of which the unions say is partisan. The controversial prompt asks: “How would you help advance the President’s Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role?” Applicants must also cite specific executive orders or policies they would support.
Union leaders argue this question forces job seekers to demonstrate political agreement with the president to be considered for employment, undermining the nonpartisan foundation of the federal workforce. AFGE President Everett Kelley condemned the move, calling it “illegal” and warning it could erode opportunities for skilled workers who serve without political bias.
OPM Director Scott Kupor, however, defended the process, stating the essay questions are optional and that political or ideological beliefs are not factors in hiring. He maintained that the hiring plan prohibits ideological tests and preserves the apolitical nature of government service.
The unions’ lawsuit asserts that the OPM’s directive infringes on First Amendment free-speech rights and violates the Privacy Act by conditioning federal employment on political conformity. The outcome could shape future standards for merit-based hiring in the U.S. civil service.
