Trump-Xi Summit Sparks Renewed Hope for Americans Detained in China 
Florida Investigates OpenAI and ChatGPT Over Alleged Role in FSU Shooting 
Comey Faces Charges Over Instagram Post as Free Speech Debate Intensifies 
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone 
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case 
Taiwan Independence Debate: China, U.S., and Taipei Tensions Explained 
Judge Orders Release of Family After Longest ICE Detention Under Trump Administration 
US-China Trade Talks Sideline Chip Export Controls as Nvidia China Sales Draw Attention 
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case 
Vance Says Progress Made in Iran Nuclear Talks as Trump Rejects Tehran Proposal 
US Hosts Israel-Lebanon Talks as Ceasefire Deadline Nears 
Ukraine Begins Major POW Swap as 205 Soldiers Return from Russian Captivity 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Japan Considers Extra Budget Aid Amid Rising Fuel and Utility Costs 
Russian Border Drone Attack Leaves One Dead in Belgorod Region 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
Coles “Down Down” Ruling Sparks Fresh Scrutiny of Australian Supermarket Pricing 
Three major federal worker unions have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that a newly added question in federal job applications violates the U.S. Constitution. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and the National Association of Government Employees (NAGE) jointly sued the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in federal court in Boston, arguing that the question unlawfully tests political loyalty.
The lawsuit targets a hiring reform implemented by OPM following a January executive order by President Donald Trump aimed at “restoring merit” to federal hiring. As part of the change, applicants are asked to respond to four essay questions—one of which the unions say is partisan. The controversial prompt asks: “How would you help advance the President’s Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role?” Applicants must also cite specific executive orders or policies they would support.
Union leaders argue this question forces job seekers to demonstrate political agreement with the president to be considered for employment, undermining the nonpartisan foundation of the federal workforce. AFGE President Everett Kelley condemned the move, calling it “illegal” and warning it could erode opportunities for skilled workers who serve without political bias.
OPM Director Scott Kupor, however, defended the process, stating the essay questions are optional and that political or ideological beliefs are not factors in hiring. He maintained that the hiring plan prohibits ideological tests and preserves the apolitical nature of government service.
The unions’ lawsuit asserts that the OPM’s directive infringes on First Amendment free-speech rights and violates the Privacy Act by conditioning federal employment on political conformity. The outcome could shape future standards for merit-based hiring in the U.S. civil service.
