As President-elect Donald Trump prepares for his second term, he has vowed to expand on the controversial tariffs introduced during his first tenure. Targeting America's trading partners, including Canada, Mexico, and China, Trump threatens to impose stricter levies unless they meet demands ranging from border security to supply chain reforms. While the rhetoric has energized some domestic industries, economists caution that tariffs are a double-edged sword with significant winners and losers.
Trump has already set his sights on countries like Canada and Mexico, calling for stronger measures to combat undocumented migration and drug trafficking across U.S. borders. However, experts argue that while such policies aim to protect certain domestic sectors, they could trigger economic ripple effects that harm consumers, exporters, and global trade dynamics.
Winners: Domestic Manufacturers and Select Industries
Supporters of Trump’s tariff policy highlight potential benefits for specific domestic industries. Gene M. Grossman, a professor of international economics at Princeton University, noted that manufacturing sectors such as toys, furniture, and appliances could see gains. By shielding these industries from foreign competition, tariffs allow U.S. firms to increase their prices and expand their market share.
Kyle Handley, an economics professor at UC San Diego, also pointed out that industries competing directly with imports, such as steel manufacturers, may benefit from reduced competition. Additionally, firms with political connections could receive tailored tariff exemptions, gaining an edge over competitors. Grossman emphasized that countries producing goods similar to those from China, such as Vietnam and Mexico, might also benefit from trade diversion.
Despite these potential advantages, experts stress that gains will likely be concentrated among a limited group of industries and firms.
Losers: Consumers, Exporters, and Supply Chains
The broader economic fallout of increased tariffs is expected to disproportionately affect consumers and exporters. Alan S. Blinder, a former Federal Reserve vice chairman, warned that higher prices on imported goods will hit U.S. consumers and businesses reliant on foreign inputs. Industries like auto manufacturing and aerospace, which depend on complex global supply chains, could face higher costs, reduced profits, and potential layoffs.
Harvard economist Jeffrey Frankel highlighted that soybean farmers and other exporters could face retaliation from foreign governments, further compounding economic losses. Frankel also suggested that inflation could rise, adding pressure to housing and other sectors already grappling with elevated costs.
Additionally, Handley cautioned that across-the-board tariffs might lead to lower wages and job cuts long before businesses consider reshoring production. “The biggest losers will be industries that use significant imported inputs,” he explained.
Public Reaction: Divided Opinions on Tariffs
Trump’s tariff policies have sparked heated debate on social media, with opinions ranging from strong support to outright criticism:
- @TradeWinsUSA: “Tariffs level the playing field for American workers. We need to protect our industries!”
- @EconGuru90: “Consumers will pay the price. Higher costs hurt us all, not just foreign exporters.”
- @FarmerFirst: “What about retaliation? Our farmers can’t survive another trade war.”
- @SteelStrong: “Finally, a president who cares about American manufacturing!”
- @SupplyChainPro: “Tariffs don’t fix global supply chains—they disrupt them. This will hurt more than it helps.”
- @ShopperAngst: “So my Cyber Monday deals will be even more expensive next year? No thanks, Mr. President.”


Democrats Face Uphill Battle in Midterm Elections Despite Recent Victories, Reuters/Ipsos Poll Shows
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
Thailand Vows Continued Military Action Amid Cambodia Border Clash Despite Trump Ceasefire Claim
Trump Signals Two Final Candidates for Fed Chair, Calls for Presidential Input on Interest Rates
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
U.S. Intelligence Briefly Curtailed Information Sharing With Israel Amid Gaza War Concerns
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations
Brazil Arrests Former Peruvian Foreign Minister Augusto Blacker Miller in International Fraud Case
Trump Claims Thailand-Cambodia Ceasefire After Intense Border Clashes
Belarus Pledges to Halt Smuggling Balloons Into Lithuania
Trump Signals Conditional Push for Ukraine Peace Talks as Frustration Mounts
California, 18 States Sue to Block Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline
Indonesia–U.S. Tariff Talks Near Completion as Both Sides Push for Year-End Deal
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs
U.S. Special Forces Intercept Ship Carrying Military Components Bound for Iran




