Trump, Xi Visit US National Archives After White House Summit 
US Backs Musk in Fight Against EU’s €120 Million X Fine 
Trump, Xi Focus on Trade and AI at White House Summit 
Judge Orders Trump to Restore White House Access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico 
Nvidia-Groq AI Chip Deal Faces U.S. Antitrust Probe 
US Supreme Court Revives Trump Administration Voter Citizenship Database 
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Sue Trump Over White House Media Ban 
Meta Found Liable in New Mexico Facebook Data Privacy Case 
Colombia Extradites FARC Dissident Leader ‘Spider’ to US 
China Reviews Broadcom Switch Use in State Data Centres 
Paramount Skydance Faces $30 Million Film Penalty in Warner Bros. Deal 
FDA Approves Mirum’s Atebrioz for Rare Bone Disorder FOP 
Sara Duterte Posts Bail Over Grave Threats Case 
China Tightens Fentanyl Rules Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit 
France Defends Netanyahu Airspace Clearance Despite ICC Warrant 
Ukrainian Drone Attacks Hit Russian Regions, Injuring at Least 12 
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW and Politico From White House 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The Trump administration has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to authorize the deployment of National Guard troops to the Chicago area, escalating tensions between the federal government and Democratic-led states. The Justice Department asked the court to overturn a lower court ruling that blocked the deployment of hundreds of troops opposed by Illinois officials, arguing that federal agents face ongoing threats from protests against Trump’s immigration policies.
Federal lawyers claimed local authorities underestimated the risks, calling their assessment of demonstrations “implausibly rosy.” The Supreme Court has ordered Illinois and Chicago leaders to respond by Monday. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker condemned the move, saying Trump’s attempt to “militarize communities” was an attack on democracy and state sovereignty.
Trump previously sent National Guard troops to Los Angeles, Memphis, Washington, D.C., and Portland, Oregon, describing these Democratic cities as lawless and crime-ridden. Critics argue that the deployments are politically motivated, aimed at punishing adversaries rather than restoring order. Federal judges have repeatedly questioned the administration’s justification, finding little evidence of the “war zone” Trump described.
The legal dispute centers on Trump’s use of a federal law allowing the president to federalize National Guard troops only during rebellion or when regular forces cannot execute federal law. Judge April Perry of the Northern District of Illinois ruled that the administration’s claims of violence during protests were exaggerated, emphasizing that peaceful demonstrations should not be equated with riots. Her decision was upheld by a federal appeals court, which stated that the president’s actions were not supported by facts.
As legal challenges mount in Illinois and Oregon, Trump continues to push the boundaries of presidential authority, raising constitutional concerns over the use of military power on U.S. soil.
