The Target employees in Virginia reportedly filed a claim against the retail giant for alleged unfair labor practices that involved intimidation and spying. With the filing, the United States Department of Labor will be reviewing the claims to determine if they hold merit.
As per Fox Business, the charge was filed by Target workers who have been seeking to unionize. They alleged that the company had created a "climate of fear and anxiety for workers" when they were trying to become part of a labor union.
The Target Workers Unite is the independent group that filed the unfair labor practice charges against the big box department store chain headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, earlier this month. Adam Ryan, the group's organizer, told Fox Business that Target store managers at Christiansburg, a town in Montgomery County, Virginia, launched what they labeled as "union busting tactics" not long after the workers displayed an interest in unionizing.
Ryan said the scheme allegedly began just days after the Target Workers Unite tried to file a petition to hold a union election with the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on May 10. He further claimed that on May 16, Target "chose to bombard store workers with management from across the state of Virginia to spy, interrogate, and intimidate workers."
The company reportedly started to hold daily meetings led by store managers from around the state, and the main aim of this was to dissuade workers from voting to hold a union election. The group leader added that managers would spy on employees and approach them individually to know what they think and which side they are leaning on.
Meanwhile, the Target Workers Unite had to withdraw its petition to vote for the union on May 18 as it failed to collect enough signatures. The Associated Press News reported that the workers had withdrawn their request from the National Labor Relations Board for a union election.
However, at that time, there was no reason given to the filing when it canceled the request. It was noted that the group actually is not required to provide a reason for the decision. And now the group is saying they were being intimidated, which was possibly why they failed to gather enough valid signatures.


US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
U.S. Government Faces Brief Shutdown as Congress Delays Funding Deal
Why Trump’s new pick for Fed chair hit gold and silver markets – for good reasons
U.S.–Venezuela Relations Show Signs of Thaw as Top Envoy Visits Caracas
Chinalco and Rio Tinto Acquire Controlling Stake in Brazil’s CBA for $903 Million
Saks Global to End Saks on Amazon Partnership Amid Bankruptcy Restructuring
Gold Prices Pull Back After Record Highs as January Rally Remains Strong
Elon Musk’s SpaceX Explores Merger Options With Tesla or xAI, Reports Say
Trump Threatens Aircraft Tariffs as U.S.-Canada Jet Certification Dispute Escalates
Oil Prices Slide Nearly 3% as U.S.-Iran Talks Ease Geopolitical Tensions
Russia Stocks End Flat as MOEX Closes Unchanged Amid Mixed Global Signals
Disney Board Nears CEO Decision as Josh D’Amaro Emerges as Leading Candidate
Asian Currencies Hold Firm as Dollar Rebounds on Fed Chair Nomination Hopes
Japan Election Poll Signals Landslide Win for Sanae Takaichi, Raising Fiscal Policy Concerns
Asian Markets Slide as Silver Volatility, Earnings Season, and Central Bank Meetings Rattle Investors
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry
Apple Earnings Beat Expectations as iPhone Sales Surge to Four-Year High 



