Canada, US Hold Constructive Trade Talks as Tariff Negotiations Continue 
Bezalel Smotrich Faces Election Battle as Israel’s Far-Right Vote Fractures 
Asian Stocks Rise as Weak US Jobs Data Eases Fed Rate Hike Fears 
Colombia President Abelardo De La Espriella Pledges Drug Crackdown, Economic Reforms 
Japan Posts First Current Account Deficit in 17 Months as Dividend Payments Surge 
Eduardo Bolsonaro Granted U.S. Green Card Amid Brazil Legal Battle and Tariff Dispute 
China Exports Beat July Forecasts as AI Demand Fuels High-Tech Trade 
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight 
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas 
US Dollar Gains as Iran Tensions, Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise 
North Korea May Deploy 120 Missiles to Russia 
Civil Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Childcare Funding Freeze and Influencer's Role 
Trump Orders Probe Into Pentagon Munitions Stockpile Leaks After Iran Conflict 
New Mexico Sues DOJ Over Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein Files Amid Ongoing Investigation 
FCC Moves to Ban Imports of Foreign Military-Grade Drones Over Security Risks 
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts 
BOJ Signals Faster Rate Hikes as Inflation Risks Raise September Move Odds 
A South Korean district court branch ordered the sale of confiscated assets of Nippon Steel Corp. to compensate four Korean plaintiffs in a wartime forced labor lawsuit.
The court seized the assets located in South Korea after Nippon Steel failed to pay damages to plaintiffs who were found by the Supreme Court in October 2018 to have been forced to work for Japan Iron & Steel Co., Nippon Steel’s forerunner, in the 1940s.
A similar ruling was made against Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. in September.
Nippon Steel is highly likely to appeal, just like Mitsubishi Heavy did, which is expected to take considerable as the case could reach the top court.
Nippon Steel did not comply with the court’s compensation order, saying that the issue of claims stemming from the 1910-1945 colonial rule was settled in 1965 under a bilateral accord.
The plaintiffs had a portion of the Japanese company’s shares in POSCO-Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture seized via the court.
In May, they asked the court to order the sale of the shares.
If the assets are liquidated, it will likely deal another blow to bilateral relations.
Japan protested to South Korea after the court order against Mitsubishi Heavy last September, warning that liquidating the seized assets “would invite a grave situation” for both countries.
Japan urged South Korea to “immediately take appropriate measures,” adding it was violating international law.
