Cuba Reaffirms Anti-Drug Cooperation as Tensions Rise in the Caribbean 
Trump and Lula Discuss Trade, Sanctions, and Security in “Productive” Phone Call 
China’s Services Sector Posts Slowest Growth in Five Months as Demand Softens 
Gold Prices Edge Higher as Markets Await Key U.S. PCE Inflation Data 
Asian Markets Mixed as RBI Cuts Rates and BOJ Signals Possible Hike 
California Launches Portal for Reporting Alleged Misconduct by Federal Immigration Agents 
U.S. Justice Department Orders Intensified Probe Into Antifa and Domestic Extremist Groups 
Intel Rejects TSMC’s Allegations of Trade-Secret Leaks as Legal Battle Escalates 
Netanyahu Requests Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Australia’s Economic Growth Slows in Q3 Despite Strong Investment Activity 
U.S. Defense Chief Pete Hegseth Defends Controversial Second Strike on Suspected Drug-Smuggling Vessel 
Dollar Holds Steady as Markets Shift Focus to 2026 Rate Cut Expectations 
UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
U.S. Futures Steady as Rate-Cut Bets Rise on Soft Labor Data 
European Stocks Rise as Markets Await Key U.S. Inflation Data 
Australia Progresses AUKUS Review as U.S. Affirms Strong Support 
A South Korean district court branch ordered the sale of confiscated assets of Nippon Steel Corp. to compensate four Korean plaintiffs in a wartime forced labor lawsuit.
The court seized the assets located in South Korea after Nippon Steel failed to pay damages to plaintiffs who were found by the Supreme Court in October 2018 to have been forced to work for Japan Iron & Steel Co., Nippon Steel’s forerunner, in the 1940s.
A similar ruling was made against Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. in September.
Nippon Steel is highly likely to appeal, just like Mitsubishi Heavy did, which is expected to take considerable as the case could reach the top court.
Nippon Steel did not comply with the court’s compensation order, saying that the issue of claims stemming from the 1910-1945 colonial rule was settled in 1965 under a bilateral accord.
The plaintiffs had a portion of the Japanese company’s shares in POSCO-Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture seized via the court.
In May, they asked the court to order the sale of the shares.
If the assets are liquidated, it will likely deal another blow to bilateral relations.
Japan protested to South Korea after the court order against Mitsubishi Heavy last September, warning that liquidating the seized assets “would invite a grave situation” for both countries.
Japan urged South Korea to “immediately take appropriate measures,” adding it was violating international law.
