AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
SoftBank and Intel Partner to Develop Next-Generation Memory Chips for AI Data Centers 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate 
Nvidia Confirms Major OpenAI Investment Amid AI Funding Race 
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns 
Jensen Huang Urges Taiwan Suppliers to Boost AI Chip Production Amid Surging Demand 
SpaceX Updates Starlink Privacy Policy to Allow AI Training as xAI Merger Talks and IPO Loom 
Elon Musk’s SpaceX Acquires xAI in Historic Deal Uniting Space and Artificial Intelligence 
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds certainly can’t claim to have been the progenitor of the Battle Royale format, but this doesn’t mean that the developers and publisher have no rights to certain aspects of the game itself. That’s why PUBG Corp. hasn’t sued Fortnite Battle Royale just yet, but it is filing a lawsuit against a copycat that went a little too far.
The progenitor of the Chicken Dinner prize trend is suing the Chinese video game company, NetEase, the developer of mobile games like Rules of Survival and Knives Out. Anyone who has been visiting gaming channels on YouTube would have likely seen ads for these games at some point and noticed how embarrassingly similar they are to PUBG. PUBG Corp. noticed this too, hence the lawsuit, Ars Technica reports.
Just for some context on just how far NetEase went to copy PUBG, it’s not just a 100-player Battle Royale game on an island where the players are dropped from a plane and parachute into, and then fight to survive until the last one standing while an ever-shrinking dome forces everyone to a certain spot. The look, feel, and even gameplay mechanics all copy PUBG.
Its only real difference from the PC and Xbox One version before the official PUBG Mobile game came out is the controls. All in all, PUBG Corp. listed about 25 items that it considers as copyright infringements.
Many of them can be argued are not specific to PUBG, such as the pre-match lobby. However, 100 players specifically jumping out of an airplane to parachute into an island does seem particularly PUBG.
The most astonishing aspect of the lawsuit, however, is the part about NetEase’s use of the iconic “Winner winner chicken dinner” that has become practically synonymous with PUBG in order to market its copycat mobile games. Even in the best case scenario, this can be considered a clever use of a recognizable phrase that could still constitute a violation.
As a result of these supposed infringements, PUBG Corp. is asking the courts to force NetEase to pay for damages and to have the games banned from operation.
