SoftBank Shares Surge as It Eyes Up to $30 Billion New Investment in OpenAI 
U.S. Stock Index Futures Steady as Markets Await Fed Policy Clues in Holiday-Thinned Trade 
Oil Prices Slip Slightly as Markets Weigh Geopolitical Risks and Supply Glut Concerns 
Anthropic Raises 2026 Revenue Outlook by 20% but Delays Path to Profitability 
Citi Forecasts a Volatile but Ongoing Bull Market for S&P 500 in 2026 
UK Politicians Call for Full Competition Review of Netflix’s Warner Bros Discovery Deal 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Micron to Expand Memory Chip Manufacturing Capacity in Singapore Amid Global Shortage 
Microsoft Wins Approval to Build 15 New Data Centers in Wisconsin 
Sam Altman Criticizes ICE Enforcement as Corporate Leaders Call for De-Escalation 
Asian Currencies Trade Flat as Dollar Weakens in Thin New Year Trading 
Oil Prices Slide in 2025 as Oversupply and Geopolitical Risks Shape Market Outlook 
Asian Stock Markets Start New Year Higher as Tech and AI Shares Drive Gains 
South Korean Won Slides Despite Government Efforts to Stabilize Currency Markets 
Hyundai Motor Shares Slide After Trump Signals Higher U.S. Tariffs on South Korean Goods 
Federal Reserve Begins Treasury Bill Purchases to Stabilize Reserves and Money Markets 
Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."
