Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


South Korea’s KOSPI Rebounds as Samsung and SK Hynix Lead Tech Stock Recovery
Yen Near 40-Year Low as USD/JPY Approaches Key 162 Level, Raising Intervention Concerns
Wall Street Slides as AI Stocks Tumble Following South Korea Tech Sell-Off
DOJ Opens Investigation Into NYC Coffee Shop Over Anti-Goldman Social Media Post
Asian Stocks Slip as Oil Rebounds Amid Fed Rate Hike Fears
Alphabet Replaces Verizon in Dow Jones Industrial Average
Tesla and NatPower Partner on $5 Billion Battery Storage Expansion in Europe
Bain Capital Nears Deal for Majority Stake in Volkswagen Marine Engine Unit Everllence
WiseTech Global Denies Knowledge of Investigation Into Founder Richard White
SpaceX Stock Rebounds After Sharp Selloff, But Valuation Concerns Persist
US Dollar Climbs to One-Year High as Fed Rate Hike Expectations Surge
U.S. Dollar Reaches One-Year High as Tech Sell-Off and Fed Rate Hike Expectations Support Demand
Heineken Names JDE Peet’s CEO Rafael Oliveira as New Chief Executive
Oil Prices Drop as Middle East Supply Recovery Eases Market Concerns
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites
Oil Prices Drop as Strait of Hormuz Shipping Recovers
Meta Reportedly Developing ‘Arena’ Prediction Market App to Rival Polymarket and Kalshi 



