Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Kroger Set to Name Former Walmart Executive Greg Foran as Next CEO
South Africa Eyes ECB Repo Lines as Inflation Eases and Rate Cuts Loom
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Yen Slides as Japan Election Boosts Fiscal Stimulus Expectations
Gold and Silver Prices Climb in Asian Trade as Markets Eye Key U.S. Economic Data
U.S. Stock Futures Slide as Tech Rout Deepens on Amazon Capex Shock
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
Oil Prices Slip as U.S.-Iran Talks Ease Middle East Tensions 



