Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


Oil Prices Rebound as Iran Denies U.S. Talks Amid Gulf War Supply Fears
OpenAI Pulls the Plug on Sora, Ending $1 Billion Disney Partnership
Time to buy local: war fuel price shocks reveal the folly of a long food supply chain
Gold is meant to be a ‘safe haven’ in uncertain times. Why is it crashing amid a war?
9 Tips for Avoiding Tax Season Cyber Scams
WTO Reform Talks Begin in Cameroon Amid Global Trade Tensions
Rio Tinto's Resolution Copper Mine: U.S. Smelting Challenges and Global Operations Update
SK Hynix Eyes Up to $14 Billion U.S. IPO to Fund AI Chip Expansion
Australia's Inflation Eases in February but Core Pressures Persist
Meta Ties Executive Pay to Aggressive Stock Price Targets in Major Retention Push
Nintendo Switch 2 Production Cut as Holiday Sales Miss Targets
Air Canada Express Crash at LaGuardia: Controller Distracted by Prior Emergency
Explosion and Fire Erupt at Valero Oil Refinery in Port Arthur, Texas
SpaceX IPO Filing Expected This Week as Valuation Could Surpass $75 Billion
Google's TurboQuant Algorithm Sends Memory Chip Stocks Tumbling
Bank of Japan Eyes April Rate Hike Despite Inflation Dip, ING Says
Wall Street Slides as Iran War Uncertainty, Oil Surge, and AI Fears Rattle Markets 



