Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."


RBA Says ASX Still Falls Short on Governance and Risk Controls
Gold Prices Fall as Treasury Yields Rise on Fed Rate Hike Bets
US 10-Year Treasury Yield at 6% Emerges as New Market Risk Threshold
Tencent Launches TenPayGo Payment App for Foreign Tourists in China
Asian Stocks Fall as Bond Yields Surge Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
fnny Beta Launches With a Simple Idea: Find an Event, Show Up, Get Rewarded
Oil Prices Surge as U.S.-Iran Diplomacy Hopes Fade
European Stocks Slip as Iran Tensions Offset Strong Eurozone Data
Japan Private-Sector Growth Slows as Domestic Demand Weakens
McDonald’s Sees Flat Traffic, Sticky Inflation as New Normal
Mercedes-Benz Eyes €800 Million Labor Cost Cuts in Germany
Asian Currencies Muted as Dollar Firms Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
US Dollar Hits Two-Month High as Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise
Paramount-Warner Bros $110 Billion Deal Draws Antitrust Backlash
Gold Drops Over 1% as Dollar, Treasury Yields Surge on Fed Rate Hike Bets
Meta Unveils Muse Charm AI Device, Expands Smart Glasses Lineup 



