New Zealand Fast-Tracks Gold Mining as Industry Revival Gains Momentum 
White House Seeks $87.6 Billion Emergency Funding for Iran War, Farmers, and Ebola Response 
Australian Household Spending Rebounds Strongly in May as Travel and Dining Drive Consumer Growth 
Singapore Inflation Stays Muted in May as Core CPI Misses Forecasts Ahead of MAS Review 
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites 
Australia Inflation Cools in May, But Core CPI Keeps RBA Rate Hike Risks Alive 
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million 
Alphabet Replaces Verizon in Dow Jones Industrial Average 
Tencent Reviews Marvelous Stake as Gaming Giant Reassesses Global Investment Strategy 
Oil Prices Drop as Middle East Supply Recovery Eases Market Concerns 
Bessent Says U.S. Must Strengthen Supply Chains and Economic Security 
U.S.-Iran Diplomacy Helps Drive Gasoline Prices Down 15% From May Highs 
Samsung and SK Hynix Shares Jump After Micron Earnings Boost AI Chip Optimism 
Asian Stocks Slide as AI Rally Pauses, South Korean Chipmakers Lead Regional Decline 
Doncasters Raises $919 Million in NYSE IPO as Aerospace Growth Accelerates 
BOJ Hawk Signals Faster Interest Rate Hikes Amid Inflation Risks 
US Dollar Climbs to One-Year High as Fed Rate Hike Expectations Surge 
Johnson & Johnson received unfavorable news for the company on Tuesday, June 1, after the Supreme Court rejected its appeal for the cancellation of a court decision where it was ordered to pay $2.1 billion in penalty.
The case against Johnson & Johnson is about the allegations the asbestos in its talc powder caused cancer in women, specifically many have reportedly developed ovarian cancer. The talc powder products also include the baby powder that has been around since 1893.
The Supreme Court upheld the penalty order
The high court announced without any kind of argument that it will not hear the case thus the penalty will not be scrapped. According to the order, Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh recused or disqualified themselves from consideration of the case.
CNBC reported that Johnson & Johnson made a request for the Supreme Court to assess the penalty it received after the amount was sustained by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020. Although the amount is high, this was already reduced from the initial $4 billion.
The company that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals and consumer packaged goods stated it is facing over 21,000 lawsuits for the talc products. Thus, in May 2020, Johnson & Johnson shared that it has already halted the selling of talc-based baby powder in Canada and the United States.
The company cited lower demand for the said item due to the spread of misinformation concerning the talc powders’ safety. It added the legal cases have also negatively affected the brand.
J&J’s response to the decision
In any case, J&J’s appeal for the Supreme Court to review its penalty was turned down and the opponent’s lawyer’s argument played a role. Ken Starr, a former Whitewater prosecutor who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson, wrote in his brief that the justices should not review the case because, for decades, the company has been aware that their talc powders are made with asbestos as one of its ingredients. The substance is said to be “highly carcinogenic with no known safe exposure level.”
Finally, Reuters reported that J&J said the decision left unresolved legal issues and maintained that its baby powder is safe. The company reiterated there are scientific evaluations that prove the “product is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."
