U.S. Pressures ICC to Limit Authority as Washington Threatens New Sanctions 
Ukraine and U.S. Officials Align on Key Post-War Reconstruction Plan, Zelenskiy Says 
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe 
US Signals Openness to New Trade Deal as Brazil Shows Willingness, Says USTR Greer 
Trump Plans Call With Thailand and Cambodia to Ease Rising Border Tensions 
U.S. Expands Sanctions on Venezuela, Targeting Maduro Family and Oil Tankers 
U.S. Bomber Flights Over Sea of Japan Signal Strong Alliance With Tokyo Amid China-Russia Drills 
US Criticizes China After Radar Incident Escalates Tensions With Japan 
Trump Signals Conditional Push for Ukraine Peace Talks as Frustration Mounts 
Australia Pushes Forward on AUKUS Submarine Program Amid Workforce and Production Challenges 
Musk Says Trump’s DOGE Initiative Fell Short and He Wouldn’t Lead It Again 
U.S. Bombers Join Japan in Show of Force Amid Rising China-Russia Military Activity 
Mexico Moves to Increase Tariffs on Asian Imports to Protect Domestic Industries 
Thailand Moves Toward Early Elections After Parliament Dissolution 
U.S. Considers Terrorism-Related Sanctions on UNRWA Amid Legal and Humanitarian Concerns 
Japan Weighs New Tax Breaks to Boost Corporate Investment Amid Spending Debate 
The former chief of staff to Donald Trump was recently criminally referred to the Justice Department for contempt of Congress. The January 6 congressional committee recently filed a motion to force Mark Meadows to testify, citing the damning text messages and witness testimony.
According to a report by Rawstory, the congressional panel filed a 248-page motion to compel Meadows to testify as the former Trump aide initially complied with the subpoena only to back out later on.
The committee’s motion used the text messages as well as testimonies from witnesses to make the argument that Meadows was the point man for the insurrection and attempts by Trump and his allies to overturn the elections.
The committee also explained why Meadows’s claims of executive privilege have no merit, citing the former Trump aide’s activities in the weeks leading up to the insurrection on January 6, 2021.
The record has shown that Meadows coordinated with a group of far-right lawmakers in Congress and outside operatives to amplify election fraud claims while pressuring the Justice Department to pursue such claims.
The panel argued that Meadows is not protected by executive privilege as he was operating as a campaign staffer or as a criminal, noting that Meadows’ attempts to interfere in the 2020 elections would be a violation of the Hatch Act, especially if he acted as a federal official. The committee cited 26 exhibits attached to the motion that included a total of 2,319 text messages from Meadows’ personal phone that the former Trump aide has turned over to the committee.
The testimonies of Trump aide Jason Miller and Meadows aide Cassidy Hutchinson were also among the testimonies included in the motion.
While the Justice Department has yet to indict Meadows for contempt of Congress, Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks speculated that the possible reason why Meadows has not been charged by the DOJ is that the former congressman may also have committed two federal crimes.
Wine-Banks’s comments follow the suggestion of legal expert Harry Litman, who said that Meadows is “up to his neck” in two possible federal crimes.
“I think that some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the Department of Justice has not yet indicted Mark Meadows for contempt, and it may be because these documents show him to be an active participant in a coup,” said Wine-Banks. “And maybe they are looking at him more seriously for a substantive part and for obstructing Congress.”
