Uber has agreed to pay A$271.8 million ($178 million) to settle a lawsuit brought by Australian taxi operators and drivers. They claimed to have lost income due to the ride-hailing company's entry into the country.
Reuters noted that the settlement, announced by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, marks Australia's fifth-largest legal agreement.
Class Action Suit Filed
The class action suit, initiated in the Supreme Court of Victoria State in 2019, represents over 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers. The lawsuit accuses Uber of violating laws that mandate taxis and hire cars to be licensed. Uber's arrival in 2012 disrupted the revenue streams of licensed taxi drivers and devalued the licenses they had invested in.
Uber's Response and Settlement
According to Yahoo, Uber has consistently denied any deliberate breaches of the law. Maurice Blackburn Principal Michael Donelly highlighted the company's strenuous defense throughout the legal process.
However, after years of contention, Uber has opted to settle the matter, according to Donelly. Uber mentioned its contributions to state-level taxi compensation schemes since 2018 and stated that the proposed settlement closes this chapter.
Former Lawmaker's Perspective
Former lawmaker and taxi driver Rod Barton, part of the class action, believes the settlement validates Uber's disregard for the country's taxi licensing regulations. Barton emphasized Uber's conscious avoidance of the licensing rules to gain a competitive edge over the taxi industry. He underscored the significance of the lawsuit in holding Uber accountable for its actions.
Impact of Legislative Changes
In 2015, legislative amendments allowed Uber to operate without taxi licenses, prompting state governments to establish compensation schemes for taxi drivers and license owners. This shift in regulations played a pivotal role in shaping the competitive landscape between traditional taxi services and app-based ride-hailing companies.
The settlement has elicited mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Members of the public and users of ride-sharing services have expressed concerns about potential increases in fares as a result of the settlement. On the other hand, taxi and rental car owners see the settlement as a bittersweet victory. It provides some level of compensation for their losses but does not fully address the long-term impact on their livelihoods.
Industry analysts believe this case sets a significant precedent for how disruptive technologies are integrated into traditional industries, highlighting the need for regulations that protect existing businesses while encouraging innovation.
Photo: Uber Newsroom


Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 



