The United States Supreme Court upheld the controversial border policy that allowed US officials to expel migrants trying to enter the country. The decision by the high court puts the policy in place for the meantime, as the final ruling is expected by June next year.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, temporarily upheld the Title 42 policy at the request of 19 Republican state attorneys general to put on hold a judge’s decision that would invalidate the border policy on Tuesday. The states argued that lifting the policy could only result in an increase of a record number of border crossings and strain the resources of the states where migrants end up.
The court said it would hear the arguments on whether the states could intervene to defend Title 42 in the court’s February session. Chief Justice John Roberts issued a temporary administrative stay on the policy on December 19 as the court considered whether to keep the policy for longer. Prior to Roberts’ order, the policy was set to expire on December 21.
Conservative justice Neil Gorsuch joined the three liberal justices – Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in dissent. Gorsuch called the order “unwise” and questioned why the court was rushing to hear a dispute on “emergency decrees that have outlived their shelf life” and that the only possible answer was because the states alleged that Title 42 would help address what they saw as an “immigration crisis.”
“But the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis,” said Gorsuch in an opinion joined by Jackson. “And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency.”
Following the Supreme Court’s temporary upholding of Title 42, the Biden administration is planning to expand the restrictions towards Cuban, Haitian, and Nicaraguan migrants that are caught at the southwest bank of the border it shares with Mexico. The administration will also allow some to enter the US on humanitarian grounds at the same time, according to three officials familiar with the matter.


Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans 



