Rubio Presses Italy Over Iran Support as Tensions Test U.S.-Italy Alliance 
US House Advances $70 Billion Immigration Enforcement Budget Plan 
Florida Launches Criminal Probe Into OpenAI Over FSU Shooting Incident 
Pope Leo Calls for Peace as Vatican Seeks Better Ties With U.S. 
U.S.-China Beef Trade Deal Hopes Rise Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit 
Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Attempting to Block Hawaii's Climate Case Against Oil Giants 
Trump Administration Dismisses Entire National Science Board, Sparking Debate Over Scientific Independence 
Rubio Approves $25.8 Billion Weapons Sale to Middle East Allies 
Pentagon Defies Court Order on Press Access, Judge Rules 
Florida Investigates OpenAI and ChatGPT Over Alleged Role in FSU Shooting 
Brazil Pension Fund Crackdown After Banco Master Collapse Raises Investment Concerns 
Apple Wins ITC Ruling, Keeping Blood-Oxygen Feature on Apple Watch 
Trump Reportedly Approves Plan to Remove FDA Commissioner Marty Makary Amid Growing Controversies 
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case 
The Trump administration has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to authorize the deployment of National Guard troops to the Chicago area, escalating tensions between the federal government and Democratic-led states. The Justice Department asked the court to overturn a lower court ruling that blocked the deployment of hundreds of troops opposed by Illinois officials, arguing that federal agents face ongoing threats from protests against Trump’s immigration policies.
Federal lawyers claimed local authorities underestimated the risks, calling their assessment of demonstrations “implausibly rosy.” The Supreme Court has ordered Illinois and Chicago leaders to respond by Monday. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker condemned the move, saying Trump’s attempt to “militarize communities” was an attack on democracy and state sovereignty.
Trump previously sent National Guard troops to Los Angeles, Memphis, Washington, D.C., and Portland, Oregon, describing these Democratic cities as lawless and crime-ridden. Critics argue that the deployments are politically motivated, aimed at punishing adversaries rather than restoring order. Federal judges have repeatedly questioned the administration’s justification, finding little evidence of the “war zone” Trump described.
The legal dispute centers on Trump’s use of a federal law allowing the president to federalize National Guard troops only during rebellion or when regular forces cannot execute federal law. Judge April Perry of the Northern District of Illinois ruled that the administration’s claims of violence during protests were exaggerated, emphasizing that peaceful demonstrations should not be equated with riots. Her decision was upheld by a federal appeals court, which stated that the president’s actions were not supported by facts.
As legal challenges mount in Illinois and Oregon, Trump continues to push the boundaries of presidential authority, raising constitutional concerns over the use of military power on U.S. soil.
