Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
LG Energy Solution Shares Slide After Ford Cancels EV Battery Supply Deal 
Maersk Vessel Successfully Transits Red Sea After Nearly Two Years Amid Ongoing Security Concerns 
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation 
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround 
Sanofi’s Efdoralprin Alfa Gains EMA Orphan Status for Rare Lung Disease 
Citi Appoints Ryan Ellis as Head of Markets Sales for Australia and New Zealand 
Elliott Management Takes $1 Billion Stake in Lululemon, Pushes for Leadership Change 
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
Apple Explores India for iPhone Chip Assembly as Manufacturing Push Accelerates 
Harris Associates Open to Revised Paramount Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation 
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
NEW YORK, Sept. 23, 2016 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the District of Minnesota on behalf of investors who purchased Polaris Industries Inc. (NYSE:PII) securities between January 26, 2016 and September 11, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Polaris made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Polaris was unable to sufficiently validate the initially identified repair for certain of its recalled RZR vehicles; (2) that the Company would ultimately need to implement a more complex and expensive repair solution; (3) that the financial impact of RZR vehicle recalls was greater than the Company had disclosed to investors; (4) that Polaris overstated its full-year 2016 guidance.
Polaris announced multiple recalls for numerous vehicles in 2015 and 2016. Then in July 2016, Polaris issued a stop-ride/stop-sale advisory pending the recall of another vehicle, citing fire hazards. Then on September 12, 2016, Polaris lowered its earnings guidance range for the full year 2016 from $6.00 per share to between $3.30 and $3.80 per share.
If you suffered a loss in Polaris Industries you have until November 15, 2016 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT: Vincent Wong, Esq. 39 East Broadway Suite 304 New York, NY 10002 Tel. 212.425.1140 Fax. 866.699.3880 E-Mail: [email protected]
