A jury is expected to decide on Monday, May 21 whether Apple will receive over $1 billion in damages from Samsung from their long-time legal battle over patent infringement claims.
Aside from competing to take the top spot in the global smartphone market, Apple and Samsung have also been butting heads in courts over patent infringement claims filed by the iPhone maker back in 2012.
In the previous week, a new jury with eight members was installed followed by the presentation of witnesses and arguments by Apple and Samsung.
As the hearing concluded last Friday, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh tasked the jury “to determine the articles of manufacture to which Samsung applied Apple’s patented designs.” To do so, Koh outlined in a 47-page final instruction four factors that the jury should consider during deliberations.
The jury will once again meet on Monday to continue their deliberation and is likely to reach a final verdict on the same day. But, according to SamMobile, there is also a chance that the decision will not be announced until Tuesday. Meanwhile, an earlier report from CNET also said Koh expects it will not take more than a few days for the jury to reach a verdict.
It has been decided in 2012 that Samsung applied Apple’s patented designs in developing their smartphones. But the Supreme Court reversed the decision in 2016 reducing the valued damages to $399 million citing that the patented designs may have only been applied to specific parts of the smartphones involved in the lawsuit. The case was, then, sent back to the district court to determine the articles of manufacture in this particular case.
In the latest trial, Apple argued that Samsung applied their patented designs on the entire phone models sold in the previous years. When favored by the jury, Apple could receive over $1 billion in damages.
Samsung, obviously, argued otherwise and maintained that the articles of manufacture, in this case, are just the phone parts and not the entire device.
The South Korean company, then, argued that the patent infringement decision should only be applied in the "round-cornered, black glass front face" for patent D’677, the "round-cornered, glass front face and surrounding rim or bezel" for patent D’087, and the "display screen" for patent D’305. Thus, Samsung is looking to pay only $28 million in damages.


US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days
Apple Eyes Chinese Memory Chips as AI Shortage Pressures iPhone Supply Chain
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites
Trump Administration to Launch Voluntary AI Standards for Frontier Models
Samsung Q2 Profit Seen Soaring as AI Memory Demand Keeps Chip Prices Elevated
Brazil Supreme Court Convicts Eduardo Bolsonaro Over U.S. Lobbying Efforts
China 618 Smartphone Sales Drop 13% as Higher Prices Hurt Demand, Huawei Gains Market Share
US Egg Producers Settle Price Manipulation Probe, Agree to Pay $3.3 Million and Donate 53 Million Eggs
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing
Pedro Sanchez’s Wife Ordered to Stand Trial in Spain Corruption Case
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
Meta Says States Seek $1.4 Trillion in Penalties Over Teen Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
AI Memory Chip Shortage Likely to Persist Despite Korea Investment Boom, Nomura Says
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Charges Against Gautam Adani in U.S. Court
Kioxia Bets on AI Memory Boom With Next-Gen NAND Production in Japan 



