TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 22, 2017 -- Lundin Law PC, a shareholder rights firm, announces a class action lawsuit against Lexmark International, Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE:LXK) concerning possible violations of federal securities laws between August 1, 2014 and July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the firm prior to the September 19, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.
To participate in this class action lawsuit, click here.
You can also call Brian Lundin, Esq., of Lundin Law PC, at 888-713-1033, or you can e-mail him at [email protected].
No class has been certified in the above action yet. Until a class is certified, you are not considered represented by an attorney. You may choose to do nothing and be an absent class member as well.
According to the Complaint, throughout the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors. On July 21, 2015, Lexmark reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, shares of Lexmark dropped in value materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
Lundin Law PC was established by Brian Lundin, Esq., a securities litigator based in Los Angeles dedicated to upholding shareholders’ rights.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethics rules.
Contact: Lundin Law PC Brian Lundin, Esq. Telephone: 888-713-1033 Facsimile: 888-713-1125 [email protected] http://lundinlawpc.com/
