After a seven-year legal battle, the jury has decided that Apple is entitled to a $539 million payment in damages over a patent infringement case against their top smartphone industry rival, Samsung.
The said amount covers damages on infringed patent designs of three smartphone parts and of two Apple facilities.
The decision, announced on Thursday, was the latest verdict in a series of re-trials for the said lawsuit originally filed by the iPhone maker in 2011. The latest trial was meant to determine, once and for all, the damages Samsung owes.
Naturally, Samsung expressed dismay over the jury’s verdict saying (via Bloomberg), “Today’s decision flies in the face of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Samsung on the scope of design patent damages.” Samsung also implied that they will continue pursuing other legal actions to reach “an outcome that does not hinder creativity and fair competition for all companies and consumers.”
Meanwhile, Apple maintained that seeking a favorable jury decision, for them, goes beyond the sum of money they will receive. “We believe deeply in the value of design, and our teams work tirelessly to create innovative products that delight our customers,” the company added.
The latest trial, led by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, was installed to determine the equivalent amount of damages based on Samsung’s sales from the infringed products. But before this, the court first needed to determine the “articles of manufacture” in this particular infringement case.
Apple maintained that the rightful articles of manufacture include the entire Samsung smartphone models where the patents in question were applied, thus, damages to be paid should be up to $1 billion — as stated in their original filing.
On the other hand, Samsung argued that the articles of manufacture are just the individual parts — including round-cornered glass front panel, round bezels surrounding the front and phone screen — and suggested that the compensation should only play around $28 million.
As indicated in the jury decision form (via CNET), the jurors priced the damages based on the patent designs’ sales on 16 Samsung products.
In 2012, a different set of jury granted Apple’s demands of $1 billion in damages. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision bringing the amount down to $399 million. Later, the case was brought back to the district court circuit to determine the articles of manufacture which led to this week’s verdict.


Super Micro Computer Shares Plunge After Co-Founder Charged in AI Chip Smuggling Case
Bolsonaro Hospitalized in ICU with Bronchopneumonia Amid Calls for House Arrest
NVIDIA's Feynman AI Chip May Face Redesign Amid TSMC Capacity Crunch
Jerome Powell May Stay on Fed Board Amid Criminal Investigation, Court Documents Reveal
Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court
Meta and Google just lost a landmark social media addiction case. A tech law expert explains the fallout
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Explosion Prompts $1M Lawsuit Over Worker Safety Negligence
SpaceX IPO Filing Expected This Week as Valuation Could Surpass $75 Billion
Makemation: a Nollywood movie that shows AI in action in Africa
Jeff Bezos Eyes $100 Billion Fund to Transform Manufacturing With AI
Nintendo Switch 2 Production Cut as Holiday Sales Miss Targets
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Move to End Temporary Protected Status for Somali Immigrants
OpenAI's Desktop Superapp: Unifying ChatGPT, Codex, and Browser Tools for Enterprise AI
Federal Reserve Crisis: DOJ Standoff Threatens Powell's Succession and Rate Stability
Palantir's Maven AI Earns Pentagon "Program of Record" Status, Reshaping Military AI Strategy
Meta Ties Executive Pay to Aggressive Stock Price Targets in Major Retention Push 



