After a seven-year legal battle, the jury has decided that Apple is entitled to a $539 million payment in damages over a patent infringement case against their top smartphone industry rival, Samsung.
The said amount covers damages on infringed patent designs of three smartphone parts and of two Apple facilities.
The decision, announced on Thursday, was the latest verdict in a series of re-trials for the said lawsuit originally filed by the iPhone maker in 2011. The latest trial was meant to determine, once and for all, the damages Samsung owes.
Naturally, Samsung expressed dismay over the jury’s verdict saying (via Bloomberg), “Today’s decision flies in the face of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Samsung on the scope of design patent damages.” Samsung also implied that they will continue pursuing other legal actions to reach “an outcome that does not hinder creativity and fair competition for all companies and consumers.”
Meanwhile, Apple maintained that seeking a favorable jury decision, for them, goes beyond the sum of money they will receive. “We believe deeply in the value of design, and our teams work tirelessly to create innovative products that delight our customers,” the company added.
The latest trial, led by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, was installed to determine the equivalent amount of damages based on Samsung’s sales from the infringed products. But before this, the court first needed to determine the “articles of manufacture” in this particular infringement case.
Apple maintained that the rightful articles of manufacture include the entire Samsung smartphone models where the patents in question were applied, thus, damages to be paid should be up to $1 billion — as stated in their original filing.
On the other hand, Samsung argued that the articles of manufacture are just the individual parts — including round-cornered glass front panel, round bezels surrounding the front and phone screen — and suggested that the compensation should only play around $28 million.
As indicated in the jury decision form (via CNET), the jurors priced the damages based on the patent designs’ sales on 16 Samsung products.
In 2012, a different set of jury granted Apple’s demands of $1 billion in damages. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision bringing the amount down to $399 million. Later, the case was brought back to the district court circuit to determine the articles of manufacture which led to this week’s verdict.


U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand 



