A U.S. federal appeals court has extended its temporary stay on a lower court ruling that challenged the Trump administration’s 10% global tariff imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The decision allows the government to continue collecting the tariff from three importers while the legal appeal moves forward.
The ruling, issued Thursday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affects three parties that previously secured relief from the tariff in a lower court decision. The impacted importers include two small businesses and the state of Washington, which paid import duties on purchases made by the University of Washington.
The legal dispute centers on the Trump administration’s use of Section 122 of the Trade Act to impose a broad 10% global tariff in February. The measure was introduced after the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated most of the tariffs that President Donald Trump had implemented in 2025. Supporters of the tariff argue it provides a temporary mechanism to address trade imbalances, while critics question the administration’s authority to apply such sweeping duties.
On May 7, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the tariff policy, finding that the administration had exceeded its authority. However, the court’s decision did not result in a nationwide halt to tariff collection. Instead, the ruling only applied to the three importers that brought the case.
Following the trade court’s decision, the Trump administration quickly appealed. On May 12, the Federal Circuit temporarily reinstated tariff collection from the three importers pending further review. The latest order extends that relief for the government, ensuring the tariffs remain in place during the appeals process.
The case is being closely watched by businesses, importers, and trade policy experts because it could shape the future use of Section 122 tariffs and executive authority over U.S. trade policy. The 10% global tariff is currently scheduled to expire in July unless Congress takes action to extend the measure. Until then, the legal battle over the Trump tariffs is expected to remain a key issue in U.S. trade and economic policy discussions.


Gold Prices Surge 7% as Dollar Falls, Fed Rate Hike Bets Ease
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon
Brazil Supreme Court Tightens Jair Bolsonaro House Arrest Ahead of Election
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits
Philippine GDP Growth Slows to 2.3% in Q2
Asian Stocks Cautious Ahead of US Jobs Data as Oil Rises
Brazil Supreme Court Approves Probe Into Lula’s Son Over Health Ministry Lobbying Claims
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues
US Dollar Falls as Weak July Jobs Report Dents Fed Rate Hike Bets
Ukraine Agrees to Protect Kazakhstan Oil Exports via Black Sea
Canada, US Hold Constructive Trade Talks as Tariff Negotiations Continue
Iran-Oman Near Strait of Hormuz Deal as Shipping Tensions Persist
Asian Currencies Hold Steady as US Dollar Nears Seven-Week Low Ahead of Key Jobs Data
DOJ Subpoenas Major Law Firms in Trump Executive Order Dispute
Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Democratic Senate Primary, Sets Up Key Midterm Showdown
Civil Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Childcare Funding Freeze and Influencer's Role
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico 



