Apple Alerts EU Regulators That Apple Ads and Maps Meet DMA Gatekeeper Thresholds 
Senators Warn Trump Against Unauthorized Venezuela Strike, Vow War Powers Push 
South Korea Forms Major AI Infrastructure Alliance with Nvidia Chips 
How did sport become so popular? The ancient history of a modern obsession 
Trump Attends Super Bowl Amid Cheers, Boos, and Political Divide 
LA28 Confirms Olympic Athletes Exempt from Trump’s Travel Ban 
FDA Names Tracy Beth Høeg as Acting CDER Director After Richard Pazdur Announces Retirement 
California Launches Portal for Reporting Alleged Misconduct by Federal Immigration Agents 
Putin Concludes High-Level Talks With Trump Envoy on Ending Ukraine Conflict 
Pepe Marti’s Epic F2 Win: ‘Game-Changer’ in Championship Battle as Abbi Pulling Steals F1 Academy Spotlight 
Trump Administration Tightens H-1B Visa Vetting With New Focus on Free Speech and Censorship 
Trump Calls for Permanent Pause on Migration After National Guard Shooting Near White House 
Extreme heat, flooding, wildfires – Colorado’s formerly incarcerated people on the hazards they faced behind bars 
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp 
Why is soccer fandom so linked to violence? 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Medicaid Funding Restrictions Targeting Planned Parenthood 
Germany Moves to Approve €2.9 Billion Defense Procurement Package 
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order introducing federal oversight on large recruiting payments in U.S. college sports, particularly football and men’s basketball. The measure seeks to curb third-party payouts from donors to athletes, aiming to protect funding for women’s and non-revenue sports while clarifying the legal status of student-athletes.
While the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) already prohibits such payments, donors have exploited loopholes amid the surge in name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals. The White House clarified the order does not restrict fair-market NIL compensation, such as brand endorsements or autograph signings. Federal agencies will now devise enforcement strategies, leveraging regulatory and funding mechanisms, though specific implementation remains uncertain.
The move follows major shifts in college sports since 2021, when the NCAA first allowed NIL monetization. In March 2025, restrictions preventing athletes from negotiating NIL deals before enrollment were lifted after an antitrust settlement with state attorneys general. The White House argues this evolving NIL landscape has created financial instability in college athletics.
Experts anticipate legal challenges, with critics arguing the order may infringe on athletes’ rights under antitrust law. Michael LeRoy, a labor law professor, noted the NCAA’s refusal to recognize athletes as employees or allow collective bargaining as a core issue.
NCAA President Charlie Baker welcomed federal attention, urging bipartisan legislation to address structural threats to college sports. The order is Trump’s latest intervention in athletics, following directives on transgender participation in women’s sports and funding disputes with elite universities.
This executive action could reshape college sports economics, influencing scholarship allocations and the broader NIL market while intensifying debates over amateurism and athlete compensation.
