Alibaba Plans Revenue-Sharing Model for Qwen3.8-Max AI Commercial Users 
SpaceX Targets Starship Flight 14 With First V3 Starlink Satellite Launch 
Novo Nordisk Raises 2025 Outlook Despite Wegovy Pill Miss and CagriSema Setback 
AI Data Center Boom Faces New Risks as Public Backlash and Policy Scrutiny Grow 
UOB Q2 Net Profit Rises 10% as Wealth Management Growth Boosts Earnings 
Nintendo Shares Jump as Switch 2 Sales Boost Earnings 
SK Hynix Bonus Dispute Deepens as Union Rejects Stock-Based Payout Proposal 
Mercedes-Benz Stock Offers Deep-Value Potential as Citi Sees Recovery Catalysts 
Moderna Wins FDA Approval for mFLUSIVA mRNA Flu Vaccine for Adults 50+ 
T-Mobile Executives Reportedly Oppose $300 Billion Deutsche Telekom Merger 
DBS Raises 2025 Outlook After Record Q2 Profit Driven by Wealth Management 
Western Digital Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as FY2027 Outlook Tops Expectations 
Glencore Posts Strong H1 2026 Earnings, Announces ASX Secondary Listing 
UK AI Security Tests Reveal Anthropic and OpenAI Agents Attempted Unauthorized Actions 
Qantas Shares Climb as Long-Haul Pilot Deal Eases Strike Concerns 
Apple Stock Slides 7% as Weak Sales Forecast Overshadows Quarterly Earnings Beat 
Meta AI Model Exploits Security Flaw During Cybersecurity Test, Raising AI Safety Concerns 
Tesla shareholders are set to appear in court to dispute a $1.44 billion attorney fee request related to CEO Elon Musk's invalidated $56 billion compensation plan. The fee demand, initially $7.2 billion, has sparked significant controversy among investors.
Tesla Shareholders Challenge $7.2 Billion Legal Fee Request Following Invalidation of Musk’s Compensation Plan
As part of the case in which a Delaware judge invalidated CEO Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation plan earlier this year, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to appear in court this week to contest counsel requests for billions in legal fees.
In January, Delaware Judge Kathaleen McCormick invalidated Musk's compensation plan from 2018, which shareholders had previously authorized. This decision was made as part of a case with shareholder Richard Tornetta. Tornetta's attorneys, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, and two other law firms, subsequently requested approximately 29 million Tesla shares as legal fees, valued at roughly $7.2 billion at Tesla's Friday stock price.
According to a report from Reuters, Tesla shareholders are scheduled to attend a court hearing on July 8 to contest the attorney fees. As detailed in court documents, the initial fee requests represented a record-high legal fee demand, bringing pay rates to approximately $370,000 per hour for all 37 attorneys and other professionals involved.
“The legal fees appear exceedingly disproportionate and outlandish,” wrote Nathan Chiu, a New Jersey-based shareholder, to Judge McCormick in a March filing.
Tesla Shareholders, Including Major Funds, Object to $1.44 Billion Legal Fee Request in Court
According to court documents, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and over 8,000 Tesla shareholders are among the other shareholders who have submitted over 1,500 letters and objections to the fee.
Teslarati reported that the legal team's request was reduced to $1.44 billion last month, equating to over $200,000 per hour of labor on the case. Court documents also indicate that confident case attorneys, associates, and paralegals typically charge as little as $275 per hour.
The case involving Tornetta, who held nine Tesla shares at the time of the initial litigation in 2018, commenced in 2022 and concluded in January when McCormick ruled in favor of the shareholder.
Musk described the request as "criminal," "ironic," and "utterly disgraceful" in March following the initial reports about the fee. He also referred to the attorneys as "evil" twice.
Last month, Tesla shareholders ratified the previously authorized compensation plan and voted to relocate the company's incorporation from Delaware to Texas.
Photo: Microsoft Bing
