The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to examine the legality of President Donald Trump’s directive aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, a move that could redefine a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment. The decision to hear the case follows a Justice Department appeal challenging a lower court ruling that blocked Trump’s order, which instructed federal agencies not to recognize citizenship for children born in the United States unless at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.
The lower court concluded that the directive violated both the 14th Amendment and federal law, prompting a class-action lawsuit from affected families. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments this term, with a ruling anticipated by June. The executive order, signed on Trump’s first day of his second term, reflects his continued efforts to tighten both legal and illegal immigration—policies that have repeatedly sparked national debate and accusations of discrimination.
For more than a century, the 14th Amendment has been widely interpreted to guarantee citizenship to nearly all babies born on U.S. soil. However, the Trump administration contends that this protection should not extend to children of undocumented immigrants or individuals in the country temporarily, such as students or workers on visas. Supporters of the policy argue it addresses issues like illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism,” while critics maintain that no president has the authority to alter constitutional guarantees.
Challengers emphasize that the Supreme Court settled the matter in the 1898 Wong Kim Ark case, affirming that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents are citizens. They also cite federal laws that codify this longstanding interpretation. The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case before lower appeals courts weighed in underscores its national importance.
This ruling could significantly impact immigration law, federal authority, and the future of birthright citizenship in America.


Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
U.S. Announces Additional $6 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Cuba Amid Oil Sanctions and Fuel Shortages
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 



