Coca-Cola, Microsoft Forge $1.1B Alliance for Cloud and AI Innovation 
Tesla to Lay Off 2,700 in Austin, Over 3,300 in California Under Restructuring Scheme 
Mentorship is key to improving social and economic outcomes for Black youth 
Philippines SEC Directs Google, Apple to Delist Binance App Over Investor Security Concerns 
Industrialisation is still vital to economic development but some countries are struggling to reap its benefits 
The yen plunges to 34-year low despite interest rate hike 
Asahi Kasei to Build EV Battery Plant in Canada to Supply Key Parts to Honda Motor 
Why China’s economy has hit a wall 
‘They don’t have enough’ – schools in England are running food banks for families 
Digital trade protocol for Africa: why it matters, what’s in it and what’s still missing 
Will global oil supply be at risk if Iran and Israel pull the Middle East into war? 
The language of insolvency: why getting it wrong can harm struggling firms 
Tesla Reveals Plans to Release New EVs Earlier Than Scheduled, to Introduce Cheaper Models 
Industry shutdowns are messy and painful: 4 lessons Australia’s coal sector can learn from car-makers about bowing out 
Why is toddler milk so popular? Follow the money 
Samsung Electronics, along with its four affiliates, were fined by the Korea Fair Trade Commission for awarding cafeteria contracts to Samsung Welstory, one of its affiliates, since 2013. The trade watchdog explained that it imposed the $207 million or ₩234.9 billion fine because the deal ensured a high-profit margin for the company.
Why Samsung Elec was fined
As per Reuters, Samsung Welstory is a meal provider for company cafeterias, and it is entirely owned by Samsung C&T. It was mentioned that the jailed Samsung Electronics’ vice chairman, Lee Jae Yong, has an 18.1% stake in this affiliate as of May and this is one of the reasons why the contracts are questionable and may have violated some of KFTC’s policies.
The KFTC said that Samsung Electronics and its affiliates unfairly bankrolled Samsung Welstory through signing private agreements with it since 2013. The commission explained this is not allowed because it just awarded the contracts without giving other cafeteria operators to compete, and obviously, Samsung Elec is favoring Welstory.
With the arrangement, Korea’s FTC said that the Samsung family owners greatly benefited from this. Thus, on Thursday, June 24, the regulatory agency imposed penalties on Samsung Electronics, Samsung SDI, Samsung Display, Samsung Welstory, and Samsung Electro-Mechanics.
Samsung’s response to the fine
In a statement, Samsung Electronics said that there was no unfair practice in the deals. It insisted that “no unfair support” took place in the dealings concerning the in-house cafeteria.
The company added that it strives to provide its workers with good-quality meals; thus, it has chosen the firm.
Samsung Elec added that to prove that there was nothing suspicious in the contracts, it is planning to show the documents for FTC to see that the transactions were standard. It will be challenging FTC’s decision after review, as per Pulse News.
Finally, Samsung Electronics lamented that the Fair Trade Commission’s announcement regarding the fine could mislead the public’s opinion. It said that it may affect the decisions and direction of investigations and trials that may happen in the future. Thus, it will take legal action to prove that the Welstory transactions were fair and normal under commercial terms.
