Samsung, the Benelux arm of the South Korean electronics company, was reportedly slapped with a hefty fine of $46.9 million or €40 million. Based on the reports, the penalty was imposed by the Authority for Consumers and Markets for price fixing in the Netherlands.
The Dutch competition regulator revealed about the fine on Wednesday, Sept. 29. It was learned that the price fixing issue is related to the prices of televisions in the said country.
According to Reuters, the Netherlands’ ACM said that for years, Samsung hiked up the prices of the TVs it sells in the country by urging local retailers to raise their prices. The Korean firm was said to have been persuading them to increase the price tags if they were selling televisions below Samsung’s preferred market price.
The ACM said that this action weakened the competition between seven of Netherland’s major online electronics stores. The regulator added that Samsung also told the retailers involved that their rivals will also observe its pricing policy, so this probably is one reason why they were convinced.
Moreover, the electronics company was also reported to have contacted the retailers if their rivals complained about the low prices of the televisions. This information was recorded on a document that was obtained by the ACM. “Samsung’s advice was not individual and not without consequences,” the Swiss regulator stated.
At any rate, Samsung Electronics Benelux denied the allegation that it pushed the retailers to use its preferred price. It said that it is disappointed with ACM’s decision to penalize them. The company said it never forced them, and they have always been free to decide and apply their own strategy for selling their products.
Finally, the Associated Press News reported that Samsung would file an appeal as it believes it did not violate any rules as alleged. Still, the Dutch watchdog said that the company should have known that its moves to influence the TV prices went far beyond the normal guidance. It said that the undue influence to the online retailers was damaging to a healthy competition atmosphere.
“Under the pretense of ‘price recommendations,’ Samsung made sure that retailers increased their prices to the market price that Samsung desired,” Martijn Snoep, ACM’s board chairman, said in a statement. “Samsung’s practices disrupted competition at the retail level, and resulted in higher prices for consumers.”


India Budget 2026: Modi Government Eyes Reforms Amid Global Uncertainty and Fiscal Pressures
Wall Street Slips as Tech Stocks Slide on AI Spending Fears and Earnings Concerns
Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Investment Faces Internal Doubts, Report Says
Pentagon and Anthropic Clash Over AI Safeguards in National Security Use
Philippine Economy Slows in Late 2025, Raising Expectations of Further Rate Cuts
SpaceX Seeks FCC Approval for Massive Solar-Powered Satellite Network to Support AI Data Centers
Apple Forecasts Strong Revenue Growth as iPhone Demand Surges in China and India
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Trump Threatens 50% Tariff on Canadian Aircraft Amid Escalating U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute
Asian Currencies Trade Flat as Dollar Retreats After Fed Decision
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Canada’s Trade Deficit Jumps in November as Exports Slide and Firms Diversify Away From U.S.
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Dollar Struggles as Policy Uncertainty Weighs on Markets Despite Official Support
Gold Prices Pull Back After Record Highs as January Rally Remains Strong
Asia Stocks Pause as Tech Earnings, Fed Signals, and Dollar Weakness Drive Markets
Meta Stock Surges After Q4 2025 Earnings Beat and Strong Q1 2026 Revenue Outlook Despite Higher Capex 



