Tesla and NatPower Partner on $5 Billion Battery Storage Expansion in Europe 
South Korea Remains MSCI Emerging Market Despite Reform Progress 
Apollo Debt Solutions Limits Redemptions as Withdrawal Requests Surge 
FedEx Stock Drops After Weak 2026 Earnings Forecast Despite Strong Q4 Results 
Baseten Secures $1.5 Billion Funding at $13 Billion Valuation Amid AI Infrastructure Boom 
Alphabet Replaces Verizon in Dow Jones Industrial Average 
Singapore Inflation Stays Muted in May as Core CPI Misses Forecasts Ahead of MAS Review 
Australian Household Spending Rebounds Strongly in May as Travel and Dining Drive Consumer Growth 
Ryan Cohen Rejects GameStop Pay Package, Prepares New eBay Acquisition Plan 
DOJ Opens Investigation Into NYC Coffee Shop Over Anti-Goldman Social Media Post 
South Korea’s KOSPI Jumps Over 5% as Samsung, SK Hynix Rally on Micron Earnings Boost 
Wall Street Slides as AI Stocks Tumble Following South Korea Tech Sell-Off 
Meta Pauses Employee Activity Tracking Program Over Data Security Concerns 
Bessent Says U.S. Must Strengthen Supply Chains and Economic Security 
South Korea’s KOSPI Rebounds as Samsung and SK Hynix Lead Tech Stock Recovery 
Oil Prices Drop as Strait of Hormuz Shipping Recovers 
BOJ Hawk Signals Faster Interest Rate Hikes Amid Inflation Risks 
Lululemon Athletica has been sued by Peloton as their conflict over the latter's new apparel products escalated. The exercise equipment company headquartered in New York, New York, filed the lawsuit this week at the Manhattan federal court.
The new legal case comes two and a half months after Peloton formally established its own apparel brand. It was mentioned that the company created its own apparel line after its co-branding deal with Lululemon ended after five years.
According to Reuters, Peloton explained that Lululemon is claiming they infringed six of its design patents that can be seen on five of its newly-released leggings and women's bra line that includes Cadent Peak Bra, Strappy Bra, Cadent Laser Dot Bra, High Neck Bra, and Cadent Laser Dot Leggings. However, Peloton said that this allegation of design patent infringement lacks any merit.
Based on the report, Lululemon's lawyer sent a letter to Peloton on Nov. 11. The Vancouver, Canada-headquartered athletic apparel company informed Peloton it would sue if they didn't stop selling its new apparel products.
In response, the exercise equipment maker argued that it is easy to tell which items are made by Lululemon and which ones are from Peloton. It added that Lululemon's designs are too obvious to merit patent protection.
"On top of the numerous clear and obvious differences in design, Peloton and Lululemon's brands and logos are also distinctive and well-recognized, making confusion between products a virtual impossibility," CNBC quoted the company as saying in the lawsuit filing.
As for Lululemon, it said on Friday that it will be defending its proprietary rights "to protect the integrity of our brand, and to safeguard our intellectual property."
At any rate, Peloton filed the lawsuit against Lululemon as it would like the court to declare that it has not infringed any of Lululemon's patents and trade dress as it has claimed. The company wants the court to ultimately announce that Lululemon's infringement claims are not valid.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit that has been brought to the Manhattan court this week was filed as "Peloton Interactive Inc v Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 21-10071."
