UN General Assembly Demands Russia Return Ukrainian Children Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Trump Pardons Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández in Controversial Move 
U.S. Defense Chief Pete Hegseth Defends Controversial Second Strike on Suspected Drug-Smuggling Vessel 
Pentagon Probe Finds Hegseth’s Use of Signal Risked Exposing Sensitive Yemen Strike Details 
Bolsonaro Detained Over Alleged Escape Risk After Ankle Monitor Tampering 
Trump and Lula Discuss Trade, Sanctions, and Security in “Productive” Phone Call 
U.S. Soybean Shipments to China Gain Momentum as Trade Tensions Ease 
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Medicaid Funding Restrictions Targeting Planned Parenthood 
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
Trump Administration Halts Immigration, Green Card, and Citizenship Processing for 19 Countries 
Israel Receives Body of Deceased Hostage as Rafah Crossing Reopening Hinges on Final Returns 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
Putin Concludes High-Level Talks With Trump Envoy on Ending Ukraine Conflict 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
U.S.–Russia Peace Talks Stall as Kremlin Rejects Key Proposals 
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case 
A federal judge has temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to deploy 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, pending the outcome of a lawsuit challenging the move. U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut issued the ruling in Portland, marking a legal setback for Trump as he continues his efforts to send federal forces into cities he labeled “lawless,” often led by Democratic officials.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield filed the lawsuit on September 28, arguing that Trump’s decision violated federal law and the state’s sovereignty. The state claimed Trump exaggerated the threat posed by small, peaceful protests against his immigration policies to justify taking control of state Guard units. Oregon further alleged that Trump targeted “disfavored Democratic cities,” violating the Tenth Amendment’s protection of state authority.
Initially assigned to Judge Michael Simon, the case was later reassigned to Judge Immergut—Trump’s own appointee—after Simon recused himself due to concerns over his wife’s public criticism of the deployment. During Friday’s hearing, Immergut questioned whether Trump’s social media posts could legally justify deploying the military, expressing skepticism about their validity as official determinations.
The U.S. Department of Justice, represented by attorney Eric Hamilton, defended the deployment, claiming it was a measured response to protect the Portland Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) headquarters from “radicals.” However, Portland’s attorney Caroline Turco countered that the city’s protests were calm, with no arrests since mid-June and minimal activity preceding Trump’s declaration.
Oregon’s lawsuit adds to a growing list of challenges against Trump’s use of military forces in Democratic-led cities such as Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., where similar deployments have faced legal opposition. State leaders accuse Trump of breaching constitutional norms by using federal troops for domestic law enforcement.
