A federal appeals court on Monday denied the Trump administration's request to revoke temporary legal protections for nearly 400,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston upheld a lower court’s decision blocking the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from ending a two-year humanitarian parole program originally implemented under President Joe Biden.
The parole program allows certain migrants to live and work legally in the U.S. temporarily. DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, had sought to cancel the program without case-by-case review, arguing it retained full discretion and that the court’s order compelled the U.S. to keep "hundreds of thousands of aliens" in the country.
However, the three-judge panel, all appointed by Democratic presidents, ruled that DHS had not demonstrated a strong likelihood of success in its appeal. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani had previously found the administration’s broad cancellation of work permits and legal status unlawful, saying it bypassed individual review and misinterpreted immigration law.
Immigrant advocacy groups, including the Justice Action Center, praised the court’s decision, calling the administration’s move both “reckless and illegal.” The ruling keeps in place protections for migrants who would have otherwise faced sudden deportation.
DHS had issued a Federal Register notice on March 25 announcing the termination of Biden-era humanitarian parole, which had covered migrants fleeing crisis zones. The administration may now appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Despite the legal setback, a DHS spokesperson reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to strict immigration enforcement, stating, “No lawsuit...is going to stop us from restoring the rule of law.”
This case highlights the escalating legal and political battle over U.S. immigration policy ahead of the 2024 election.


Ukraine Claims First-Ever Underwater Drone Strike on Russian Missile Submarine
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law
Lukashenko Urges Swift Ukraine Peace Deal, Backs Trump’s Push for Rapid Resolution
Sydney Bondi Beach Terror Attack Kills 16, Sparks Gun Law and Security Debate
Ukraine’s NATO Concession Unlikely to Shift Peace Talks, Experts Say
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
Trump Claims Pardon for Tina Peters Despite No Legal Authority
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise
Jimmy Lai Convicted Under Hong Kong National Security Law in Landmark Case 



