Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a wide range of high-stakes cases challenging his administration’s policies. The rulings and pending decisions touch on tariffs, immigration enforcement, federal agency independence, transgender rights, foreign aid, and the scope of presidential authority, shaping the legal landscape of Trump’s second term.
In a landmark 6-3 decision on February 20, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The justices ruled that the 1977 law did not authorize the president to unilaterally impose broad tariffs, reaffirming that the Constitution grants Congress — not the executive branch — the power to levy taxes and regulate trade. The decision carries major implications for global markets and U.S. trade policy.
Immigration policy has also dominated the court’s docket. The justices allowed immigration raids in California to proceed, cleared the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, and permitted the rollback of immigration “parole” protections for migrants from several countries. At the same time, the court blocked certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, citing due process concerns, and ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a wrongly deported Salvadoran man. The justices will soon hear arguments over Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
The court has signaled support for expanding presidential control over federal agencies. It allowed Trump to remove officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and federal labor boards, and appeared receptive to arguments supporting his firing of a Federal Trade Commission member. However, it showed skepticism toward his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Additional rulings have permitted a transgender military ban, upheld passport restrictions tied to sex at birth, allowed mass federal layoffs, approved cuts to medical research and teacher training grants, cleared the dismantling of the Education Department, and enabled temporary withholding of foreign aid.
Collectively, these Supreme Court decisions underscore an ongoing legal battle over executive power, constitutional limits, and the future direction of U.S. domestic and foreign policy.


Russian Border Drone Attack Leaves One Dead in Belgorod Region
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice
Russia Launches Massive Drone Attack on Ukraine, NATO Allies Respond
Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed
Trump DOJ Accuses Yale Medical School of Racial Bias in Admissions
US-China Trade Talks Sideline Chip Export Controls as Nvidia China Sales Draw Attention
Bolsonaro Discharged After Shoulder Surgery Amid Ongoing Legal Troubles
US Expects China to Boost Purchases of American Farm Products After Trump-Xi Summit
Trump Pushes China Market Access During High-Stakes Xi Summit
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over Trump Administration’s Flavored E-Cigarette Policy
Rubio Urges China to Release Jimmy Lai and Political Prisoners
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political
U.S. Urges China to Help Curb Iran’s Actions in Gulf, Rubio Says
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case
Coles “Down Down” Ruling Sparks Fresh Scrutiny of Australian Supermarket Pricing
Trump Faces Uphill Battle Seeking China’s Help on Iran Conflict 



