A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Trump Administration Spent $5.6 Billion in Munitions in Opening Days of Iran Strikes
Top Democrat Accuses DOJ of Withholding FBI Records in Trump-Epstein Investigation
Mexico's Electoral Reform Bill Fails in Congress as Coalition Fractures
Japan's BOJ Independence Under Fire as PM Takaichi's Rate Stance Draws Political Heat
Defense Contractors Move to Drop Anthropic AI After Trump Administration Ban
Ukraine Strikes Russian Missile Component Factory in Bryansk Using British Weapons
Meta Encryption Plan Sparks Child Safety Concerns Amid New Mexico Lawsuit
Federal Judge Blocks Virginia Social Media Age Verification Law Over First Amendment Concerns
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, Deepening Global Trade Uncertainty
FAA Pushes for Further Flight Reductions at Chicago O’Hare Ahead of Busy Summer 2026
OpenAI Pentagon AI Contract Adds Safeguards Amid Anthropic Dispute
Iran-Israel War Sparks Global Oil Crisis as Tankers Burn in Gulf Waters
Indonesia Issues Stern Warning to Meta Over Online Gambling and Disinformation
Microsoft Backs Anthropic in Legal Fight Against Pentagon's AI Blacklist
US Approves $151.8M Bomb Sale to Israel Without Congressional Review Amid Iran Conflict
Bipartisan Housing Bill Advances in Senate, Aims to Tackle U.S. Affordability Crisis 



