Lynas Rare Earths Shares Surge as Quarterly Revenue Jumps on Strong Prices 
Global DRAM Chip Shortage Puts Automakers Under New Cost and Supply Pressure 
Lululemon Founder Chip Wilson Escalates Proxy Fight to Remove Advent From Board 
TikTok Expands AI Age-Detection Technology Across Europe Amid Rising Regulatory Pressure 
Elon Musk Seeks $134 Billion in Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Alleged Wrongful Gains 
Syrah Resources and Tesla Extend Deadline on Graphite Supply Dispute to March 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
OpenAI Launches Stargate Community Plan to Offset Energy Costs and Support Local Power Infrastructure 
HKEX’s Permissive IPO Rules Could Open Opportunities for Korea to Strengthen Its Position in International Listings 
Pop Mart Shares Surge in Hong Kong After First Buyback in Nearly Two Years 
BHP Posts Record Iron Ore Output as China Pricing Pressures Loom 
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production 
Netflix Stock Slips After Earnings as Soft 2026 Guidance Overshadows Subscriber Milestone 
White House Pressures PJM to Act as Data Center Energy Demand Threatens Grid Reliability 
United Airlines Posts Record Q4 Revenue as Premium Demand Lifts Earnings 
SK Innovation scored a point when the U.S. International Trade Commission released its preliminary decision this week. The USITC sided with SK in the battery patent lawsuit filed by LG Energy Solutions when it said that no violation was committed.
As per The Korea Times, the U.S. trade watchdog ruled in favor of SK Innovation, and this ruling was announced on Wednesday, March 31. After clearing SKI in the battery infringement suit, it was reported that the company’s shares immediately surged by 15%.
Why USITC cleared SK
The trade commission said in its preliminary ruling that it could not find evidence that proves SK Innovation infringed any of LG Energy’s battery patents. The decision was handed down as the deadline to decide whether the White House could veto a separate ITC ruling based on February’s finding that stated SKI unlawfully obtained LG’s trade secrets.
"It is my initial determination in this investigation that there is no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, in the importation into the U.S., the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain lithium battery cells, battery modules, battery packs, components thereof and products containing the same, with respect to the alleged infringement of asserted claims (of the four patents)," Judge Dee Lord stated.
But then again, it should be noted that this is just a preliminary resolution. The final ruling on LGES’ patent lawsuit against SK Innovation is due on Aug. 2.
SKI’s response to USITC decision
SKI applauded the commission’s ruling and said again that the company’s battery technologies are original. It also reiterated that the products were the results of hard work.
"We have been developing advanced battery technology over an extended period of time, and therefore anticipated that the ITC would rule that no infringements were made on LGES' patents,” SK stated. “The preliminary ruling shows SKI's technological capabilities."
This ruling is a separate case from the trade secret issue between LGES and SK Innovation. ITC sided with the former in this case, and it is facing a 10-year import ban in the U.S. SKI is currently making an appeal to reverse the resolution. This ban will take effect if President Joe Biden does not overrule the decision, and he has until April 11 to decide.
Meanwhile, Reuters noted that SK Innovation and LG Energy could dissolve the USITC ruling in this trade secret suit if they can agree to a settlement. The officials in Georgia also previously called on the companies to negotiate and end the dispute to avoid further troubles as it is not just SK and LG that will be affected if the decision is not revoked.
