South Korea's Fair Trade Commission is revising the Act on Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce to cover new forms of online transactions and to impose more responsibilities to e-commerce platforms and online retailers.
FTC Chairperson Joh Sung-wook pointed out that e-commerce platforms, despite their expanding roles and market influence, have been dodging their responsibility to protect customers, under the pretext that they are not the direct sellers of the transactions.
South Korea has been lacking a proper law to legally address issues in the e-commerce retail industry as its existing transaction law was established in 2002 when the internet was just blooming.
In the proposed revision bill by the trade watchdog, e-commerce platforms will take joint responsibility with the sellers in consumer damages.
According to the FTC, the revision bill would stipulate the role of e-commerce platforms in transactions, and allow separately claim compensation from the platform and the seller.
E-commerce operators will be required to establish a mediating system between seller and buyer, and identify parties when necessary.
The sellers will also be obligated to reveal whether those shown on the shopping platforms are advertisements or not.
New rules to address damages in purchases from overseas retailers, such as designating local agents to address conflicts, would also be introduced.
The bill was drafted through 21 meetings with e-commerce platform operators, online retailers, and consumer organizations.
In South Korea, about 15.8 percent of the 69,452 complaints in online purchases were against nine major e-commerce platforms: Naver, Coupang, Kakao, Auction, WeMakePrice, 11st, Gmarket, Interpark, and Tmon.
Of those complaints, 63.6 percent were for breach of contract and cancellation charges. Quality dissatisfaction and warranty service were also issues.
Only 58.6 percent of the said complaints have been redressed.
The online retail industry grew by more than six-fold from 25.2 trillion won in 2010 to 161.1 trillion won in 2020.


DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote
Honduras Court Drops Charges Against Ex-President Juan Orlando Hernandez
Yindjibarndi Appeals Fortescue Mining Compensation Ruling
Bashar al-Assad Sentenced to Death by Syrian Court
TikTok, DOJ Reach $400 Million Children’s Privacy Settlement
Nvidia Reportedly Eyes $13 Billion Hugging Face Acquisition
UN Chief Raises Concern Over US Sanctions on ICC Officials
Nvidia Pauses AI Cloud Financing Deals Amid Antitrust Concerns
OpenAI Rejects Apple Trade Secret Theft Claims
Nvidia Eyes $2.5 Billion Investment in Thinking Machines Lab
OpenAI Nears Astra AI Model Launch With Safety Focus
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal
U.S. Probes Apex Logistics Over Nvidia AI Chip Shipments to China
SpaceX Mobile Network Could Cost Up to $130 Billion, Bernstein Says
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case
29 US states are suing Meta. What might it mean for the rest of the world? 



