NEW YORK, Dec. 02, 2016 -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Impax Laboratories, Inc. securities (NASDAQ:IPXL) from February 25, 2014 through November 3, 2016, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Impax investors under the federal securities laws.
To join the Impax class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-981.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.
NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.
According to the lawsuit, Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Impax was engaging and/or had engaged in conduct that would cause the antitrust division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Connecticut Attorney General to conduct extensive investigations of possible collusion of generic drug pricing; (2) the DOJ investigation and the underlying conduct was likely to result in criminal charges against Impax, and possibly its officers and directors, for collusion of generic drug pricing; (3) Impax lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 9, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-981.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact, Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of The Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected].
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.
Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. Kevin Chan, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.rosenlegal.com


Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 



